sag@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoBiggest Betrayallemm.eeimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1855arrow-down18cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1847arrow-down1imageBiggest Betrayallemm.eesag@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square29linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareyeehawlinkfedilinkarrow-up88arrow-down2·edit-21 year agoTo use “u”, “ur”, and “your” in the same sentence is mind-blowing.
minus-squarenightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up38·1 year agoAt least they r each used correctly.
minus-squareexplodicle@local106.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoDid Zoomers just solve a huge problem that’s plagued the English-speaking world for generations?
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 year agoI think text speak is a bit older than the zoomers. But in any case, I propose u’re for the sake of grammatical correctness.
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoOk professor. Now fix their, there and they’re.
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoThei’re. Just merge them. Simple.
minus-squareNoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoNo it’s an extra kink in the maze of English, double possessive forms.
To use “u”, “ur”, and “your” in the same sentence is mind-blowing.
At least they r each used correctly.
Did Zoomers just solve a huge problem that’s plagued the English-speaking world for generations?
I think text speak is a bit older than the zoomers.
But in any case, I propose u’re for the sake of grammatical correctness.
Ok professor. Now fix their, there and they’re.
Thei’re. Just merge them. Simple.
No it’s an extra kink in the maze of English, double possessive forms.
And yet here you are