RandAlThorM to NBA@lemmy.world · 1 year agoDallas gives Irving 3 year $126mtwitter.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down16
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkDallas gives Irving 3 year $126mtwitter.comRandAlThorM to NBA@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squarescallredlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoIt’s “good” for Dallas because that trade would be god awful if he left for nothing. The fit and the loss of depth are still aspects left uncertain.
minus-squareAcortexOTlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoThey may be uncertain, they are certainly leaning heavily toward “not good”
minus-squarescallredlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIt is leaning that way, but I’m willing to give some benefit of the doubt to the small sample size. This contract and trade could definitely go down as one that really hurts Luka and the Mavs if it does not improve into this season and beyond.
minus-squareCalvin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago100%. Mavs would’ve been the laughingstock of the league for letting another guy go for nothing with Brunson
minus-squareOxrap@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAgred. I don’t see how the fit between Luka and Kyrie and then there’s the depth of this squad.
It’s “good” for Dallas because that trade would be god awful if he left for nothing. The fit and the loss of depth are still aspects left uncertain.
They may be uncertain, they are certainly leaning heavily toward “not good”
It is leaning that way, but I’m willing to give some benefit of the doubt to the small sample size.
This contract and trade could definitely go down as one that really hurts Luka and the Mavs if it does not improve into this season and beyond.
100%. Mavs would’ve been the laughingstock of the league for letting another guy go for nothing with Brunson
Agred. I don’t see how the fit between Luka and Kyrie and then there’s the depth of this squad.