• SkepticalButOpenMinded
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    House sizes have also ballooned. The average home size in 1949 was ~900 sq ft, whereas a new home now is ~2500 sq ft. It was still cheaper, but those homes prices are for a lot less house than people are imagining.

    • ApexHunter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not to mention changes in wiring, plumbing, materials, insulation, engineering, finishes, appliances, etc.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      My relatively small house (~1200 sq ft) was built in 1950 and is currently appraised at $550k, so it’s not just house size. Granted, I live in a highly-desirable west coast city and the lot is worth more than the house itself, but the point remains.

      • SkepticalButOpenMinded
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree, it’s definitely not just house size. But still, I’m not sure that your one data point anecdote is very meaningful. Desirable areas were more expensive in the 1950s too.

        • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          True, however, the concentration of wealth has meant that desirable areas are far more out of reach for the middle class than they were in the 1950s when unionization was at an all-time high and the difference between a highly-educated professional vs a skilled tradesman was more a matter of what kind of car they drove and how big their house was rather than what we see now which is working people being priced out of entire markets.

          I got lucky because my wife and I bought our house when the neighborhood we’re in was still seen as the ghetto. We bought it because it was the only thing we could afford and it was relatively close to my wife’s parents, but since then the neighborhood has rapidly gentrified and our property value has gone way up.

          This wouldn’t be an issue in a country wherein wealth is not so egregiously concentrated at the top.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s a lot of difference, really. Makes me wonder if this is needed, considering that the average household size had decreased from 3.33 in 1960 to 2.51 in 2023

      So it was 270 ft²/person or less before, now it’s about 1000 ft²/person

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Larger houses are due to many factors. Weren’t a lot of power tools around in 1949, and houses were heated by cast iron radiators and coal burning furnaces.

      • SkepticalButOpenMinded
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes that’s the point. We’re wealthier and more productive now and can consume some of that extra wealth. I am pointing out that we’re not comparing like for like.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Right now, most people are poorer than their counterparts from fifty years ago.

          Take away technological advances like computers and cell phones that that would have occurred anyway and look at things like work hours and quality of life.

          Hunter Thompson’s “Hell’s Angels” has a great chapter on the economics of being a biker/hippie/artist circa 1970. An Angel could work six months as a union stevedore and have enough money to hit the road for two years. A part time waitress could support herself and her musician boyfriend.

          As late as 1980, ‘middle class’ was defined as one high school graduate supporting a family of four. After three terms of Reaganomics ‘middle class’ was two college grads working full time. Also, $1 million in 1980 was still a vast fortune and nowadays it’s what a rich guy pays for a party.