A whole swath of GOP voters appears firmly committed to not voting for Trump in November.

A whole swath of GOP voters appears firmly committed to not voting for Trump in November.

Donald Trump has a problem no matter what happens in New Hampshire on Tuesday night: There’s a whole swath of the Republican electorate and a good chunk of independents who appear firmly committed to not voting for him in November if he becomes the nominee.

It’s an issue that became starkly apparent in polling ahead of the Iowa caucuses, when an NBC News/Des Moines Register/Mediacom poll of voters in that state found that fully 43 percent of Nikki Haley supporters said they would back President Joe Biden over Trump. And it’s a dynamic that has been on vivid display as the campaign shifted this week to New Hampshire.

“I can’t vote for Trump. He’s a crook. He’s too corrupt,” said Scott Simeone, 64, an independent voter from Amherst, who backed Trump in 2016 and 2020. “I voted for him, and I didn’t realize he’s as corrupt as he is.”

  • Pratai
    122·
    5 months ago

    You clearly don’t understand what’s being explained to you. Be humble, admit you’re wrong, and correct. This is how we become better people.

    • centof@lemm.eeEnglish
      416·
      5 months ago

      What do you claim I am wrong about or don’t understand? If I clearly don’t understand it then why did you feel the need to point that out?

      I value what you say and would not laugh at you for expressing your beliefs. :P

      • Pratai
        81·
        5 months ago

        Do you seriously think I’m unaware of your sea lioning here? Get more experience before taking your show live, kiddo.

        • centof@lemm.eeEnglish
          15·
          5 months ago

          The only reason you are calling it sea lioning is because it is massively downvoted. If this same discussion was upvoted you wouldn’t care.

          Sea lioning

          Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity (“I’m just trying to have a debate”), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.

          Asking someone to explain their claim that I don’t know what I’m talking about is not a request for evidence. And I’m not feigning ignorance on this matter, I am explaining why the original claims in question were false.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            31·
            5 months ago

            I applaud your attempts at getting people to understand your point. Nothing frustrates me more than seeing a point made, that might even be wrong, but every goddamn reply is just “hurdur you’re dense, you don’t get it. You are dumdum. Get with program buddo.”

            If they’re wrong, or don’t agree, EXPLAIN IT WITHOUT AD HOMENIN B.S

            Ughh…

          • Pratai
            32·
            5 months ago

            That’s exactly what you’re doing.