• thanks_shakey_snake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    5 months ago

    Piped: piped.video Invidious: yewtu.be

    Those would be good places to start, if you still want YouTube content without the YouTube front-end.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      5 months ago

      It might be a little surprising given what I literally just said, but I am not unreservedly in favor of just grabbing someone else’s content from someone else’s server and then playing it without the ads that pay for the hosting bills for the origin server.

      I realize I’m probably in the minority in that, but I feel like a fully off-Youtube video hosting solution might be a better way.

      • randomname01@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        I get what you’re saying, but the simple fact is that most of the content is on YouTube. An alternative would be better (and PeerTube might get there one day), but you’d be very limited in your choices if you avoided YT entirely. Also, I can’t personally feel too bad about “stealing” from YouTube.

      • OminousOrange
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        In this case, the someone else is Alphabet megacorp. I wouldn’t waste any concern on them. The content is still hosted by YouTube, just played through the invidious instance.

        To do away with all those concerns, you could self-host invidious, or donate to the instance you choose to use if self-hosting is outside of your technical prowess. If you want to support certain creators, donate to them directly instead.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It really gets to be a lot of edge cases to keep track of nowadays though, am I the only one? I mean the collection of scripts I have to keep track of to keep everything running as normal feels like the beginning of a new operating system.

          • OminousOrange
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            In hosting invidious or what? I’ve got it running pretty maintenance free in a docker LXC in Proxmox and use Twingate for access to it and everything else outside my home network. There was a learning curve to set up, but there’s plenty of yt tutorials to guide you through.

            • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’ve got it running pretty maintenance free in a docker LXC in Proxmox and use Twingate for access to it and everything else outside my home network.

              Read that sentence back to yourself and tell me there isn’t a lot to keep track of. Remember, this is specifically for solving 1 issue. Sysadmins and hard core masochists will learn every framework and take a scalpel to both software and hardware if needed, but that is not 99% of the world’s demographic.

              • OminousOrange
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yes, it’s a lot of words, but there’s really nothing to keep track of after setup. I just go to my invidious ip rather than youtube.com and it works. There are very good tutorials available if you want to implement these solutions. That’d be a good first step rather than the ‘I’ve tried nothing and am all out of ideas’ approach.

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                well yeah, you should be familiar with the services you host, means you are competent with them, and are capable of fixing things when they explode.

                I mean, would you rather have spent 50 hours learning and setting something up, becoming somewhat familiar with it, vs clicking a button and it runs. In the event that it explodes and you need to maintain something?

                It’s a price that’s worth paying for, not to mention it’s not like you’ve wasted that time. It’s time that you can use to put into other things that will benefit your life. I am currently running about 4-5 services, aside from game servers, that directly benefit my life. Because i’ve taken the time to learn and understand that stuff. (all of which are free, and run on my own hardware)

                Plus it gives me freedom, i’m confident and content that i could self host every service i would need to use, in the event i dont want to use outside services. It wouldn’t be pleasant to learn and or setup, but i absolutely could.

                • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Should, would, could. Do you know the difference between a prescriptive and a descriptive statement? Look, my point is- things are getting out of hand complicated, if you think they easy, then you already born into a framework. Know whadamsayn.

      • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        I just bought a Nebula subscription. I can’t say they’re a replacement for YT, but they have good content.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, I was gonna say something about Nebula / Curiositystream. I actually think that that + somewhere to play music would take care of 95% of what I use Youtube for.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think that’s a very valid point, because that’s literally what Google does with AMP links…

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        being a yt-dlp user myself, who runs a media server for mostly YT content.

        I can say that google deserves it. They store like 2-3x the amount of data that they need to be storing per video. 11 files for a single video 1080p to 4k. All different bitrates, some barely different than any others. (i realize it’s for codec support, but like, seriously?)

        especially when they run predatory ads, force services into youtube premium that you don’t want, just generally do not respect the creator base and certainly not the viewer base. Honestly i think google deserves to lose money right now.

      • kworpy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Google is the 4th richest company in the world… Besides they don’t deserve a dime from you, fuck them.

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Check if any of your favorite channels are on Nebula. If so, maybe there are other channels worth watching.

        When I realized that, I’ve severely reduced my YouTube time. Actually, now it’s split among Nebula, Odsee, YT etc.

      • Luke@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        There are other instances for both piped and invidious aside from the ones linked above. I believe the intended usage involves you finding the instance closest to you in terms of network, which may not be those specific instances linked above.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yew a kind of coniferous tree which has red, berry-ike fruits, most parts of which are highly poisonous.