The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Friday to hear a case out of Southern Oregon that could make sweeping policy changes to the way cities address homelessness and enforce rules around public camping.

In 2022, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals blocked Grants Pass from enforcing public camping ordinances through fines, saying it violated the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the U.S. Constitution’s Eighth Amendment. That ruling built off a 2019 decision out of Boise, Idaho, where the same court found a person cannot be criminally punished for sleeping in public if there’s nowhere else for them to go.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240116133347/https://www.opb.org/article/2024/01/12/us-supreme-court-takes-grants-pass-oregon-case-homeless-policies/

  • digger
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It won’t apply in front of this court. The USA, where corporations are considered people but the homeless are not.

    • Too Lazy Didn't Name@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It should apply, if only the rich werent the ruling class. Id consider taking money from someone who has nothing/very little to be cruel.