• bionicjoey
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    I always assumed it was a bit like SHA hashing. Yes, collisions are theoretically possible. But they’re so unlikely that it can be used as a unique identifier for most purposes.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      190
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      That is not at all what this article is about. The headline is terrible.

      The research is suggesting that there may exist “per-person” fingerprint markers, whereas right now we only use “per-finger” markers. It’s suggesting that they could look at two different fingers, (left index and right pinky, for example) and say “these two fingerprints are from the same person”.

      When they say “not unique”, they mean “there appear to be markers common to all fingerprints of the same person”

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Precisely. We’ve always known that identical fingerprints are not just possible but more common than the regular folk would imagine. The point is that the statistical probability of two individuals being in the same room at the same time and related to the same crime with the exact same fingerprints are so low as to make fingerprint ID good enough.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Multiply that by fingerprint evidence being often partial and damaged and how few shits the penal bureaucracy gives about people they’ve already decided are guilty

      • bionicjoey
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Excepting of course identical twins

        Edit: apparently I was wrong

          • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’ve known of identical twins with different genders.

            Part of what makes a human’s in the making not the blueprints, one feels.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 months ago

          Identical twins do not have identical fingerprints, because fingerprints are not only genetic. They might be close or somewhat similar, but rarely identical. They can be distinguished as different individuals by regular pedestrian forensic techniques.