Question inspired by the image (see attached)

  • folkrav
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s incredibly easy to fall into the trap of seeing modern societies as more advanced. There’s no reason to think they weren’t just as intelligent and resourceful as we are today. They just lived a long time ago. If history can teach us one thing, it’s that nobody rules the world forever, as advanced a civilization can be.

    • KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Prior to collapsing, Rome achieved a sustained population in excess of a million people.

      This did not occur again anywhere else until the mid 1800s.

    • AmidFuror@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t agree with how you seem to be defining “advanced.” You seem to be tying that to intelligence and resourcefulness, as opposed to culturally. I think most use it to talk about the sum of knowledge and technology that a civilization has.

      While ancient cultures were able to learn a lot about the world around them, today we know what they knew and a shit ton more. They figured out how planets and stars move. We’ve figured out what they’re made of, how they bend space and time, their distances. We’ve landed machines on some and put them in orbit around others.

      They had some cool medical tricks. We have many complex but routine surgeries with high survival rates due to development of drugs, equipment, and sterile environments.

      They could write down their learnings to share with others of their culture. We have a global network of scientists sharing massive data sets and inferences.

      Their innate capabilities were probably no different than our own, but we have massively advanced the scale and scope of learning shared with each generation. We have a much greater degree of specialized knowledge advancing and branching out at a very high rate.

      • folkrav
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe it’s an English second language thing, or just how I expressed myself, but yes, I was referring to the first. Our technological capabilities are obviously on a whole other level. Electricity + transistors basically transformed the world. Plus the massive population growth.

        • AmidFuror@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep, it’s just semantics, then. We are not more advanced in the sense of biologically more capable than people thousands of years ago. A few hundred thousand, maybe. Since the split from chimps, I like to think so!

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right, we’re a lot more advanced technologically and in many aspects even socially. We’re still just as intelligent and dumb as a species as we were 15000 years ago though. Which I think is the point the OP was trying to make using a wrong word.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      We had to develop sapience at some point, but I’d guess it was closer to when we invented cooking than writing. Egypt isn’t even that old by the standards of the human race.

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Based on the planet’s climate trajectory, humanity may not rule it forever, but we’re aiming to be the last.