The Republicans hit every point possible without actually having full power, and they’ve vowed to enact the couple of others as soon as they get the chance. It’s literally in their platform.
Again, how many can you give examples for with the Democrats? I’m still waiting.
So you don’t have a reasonable argument, then. Ad hominem is a weak escape hatch.
it’s not ad hominem. it’s tu quoque.
Tomato tomahto. Attacking the person rather than the point is weak.
i’m saying that you don’t understand the topic, and you’re telling me the same thing. that’s hardly attacking the person.
I linked the actual definition and asked you for evidence to support your point, which you haven’t provided.
If you know so much more than me, please prove me wrong. Personal attacks don’t make you seem like you know what you’re talking about.
>If you know so much more than me, please prove me wrong.
you won’t listen to me. i tried.
>>I linked the actual definition and asked you for evidence to support your point, which you haven’t provided.
yes, i did. you just don’t like it.
No you didn’t. This has become tiresome.
I’ll make it simpler for you: please go through the 14 points of fascism and give an example for each that show the Democrats are trying to enact it.
It shouldn’t be hard. I did it for the GOP without even trying.
>I’ll make it simpler for you: please go through the 14 points of fascism and give an example for each that show the Democrats are trying to enact it.
the republicans don’t hit all 14, either. but that doesn’t make them any less fascist.
The Republicans hit every point possible without actually having full power, and they’ve vowed to enact the couple of others as soon as they get the chance. It’s literally in their platform.
Again, how many can you give examples for with the Democrats? I’m still waiting.
>This has become tiresome.
refusing to learn seems exhausting. you should take a break.
This is almost fun. Almost.