Coroner calls on Google and Amazon to act after British woman’s suicide::Chloe Macdermott researched suicide methods on a forum and bought lethal substance online from US

  • OtterA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    That assumes that the person was going to die regardless, while in reality lots of people can and do get the support that they need. This is different from medically assisted dying.

    Hiding information doesn’t help, but encouraging support and controlling the market for the poisons can help.

    “Suicide is a sin” isn’t the only reason we support those dealing with the issues, even if that might be the motivation of people in some places.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Helping people, yes

      Giving people options, yes

      Showing people a better way, yes

      Removing options, gatekeeping

      Restricting information, gatekeeping

      • OtterA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Removing options, gatekeeping

        There’s some nuance here too

        Say barriers on bridges and high areas that the public can access. It’s removing an option yes, but it might be enough friction to stop the person till they can receive the help they need

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          6 months ago

          I concede the benefit of barriers to prevent accidents, or to discourage people from jumping from this point right here. Delaying the impulse. We don’t deny people the knowledge of gravity, and we don’t legistate the removal of high places. If someone really wants to jump they have options, hiking to a cliff etc.

          Let’s say there is a magic pill, that is painless, no side effects, etc. let’s say we made this available for people’s pets in pain, but not for humans in pain. In this fictional universe the gatekeeping of “enough pain” to justify a dignified and self selected exit is a net evil. As long as a human has agency they should have a choice without officials gatekeeping their knowledge. (I.e. we shouldn’t nanny adults)

        • unrelatedkeg@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t think the main point of the barriers is preventing suicide specifically, but safety in general. Preventing suicide is more of a bonus.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That assumes that the person was going to die regardless, while in reality lots of people can and do get the support that they need.

      Lots, but not the majority. Most people simply have to live in misery, because help is usually paywalled, or delayed badly by funding cuts to public health. Restricting the means to commit suicide without also making help fully accessible to everyone that needs it, and available when they need it, increases suffering.