Adam Mosseri:

Second, threads posted by me and a few members of the Threads team will be available on other fediverse platforms like Mastodon starting this week. This test is a small but meaningful step towards making Threads interoperable with other apps using ActivityPub — we’re committed to doing this so that people can find community and engage with the content most relevant to them, no matter what app they use.

  • Gestrid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Fortunately, Lemmy just launched the ability for every individual to block instances they don’t like.

    • jcarax@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oh thank god, I’m so sick of blocking furry communities. Damned things multiply like rabbits.

      • Gestrid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Lemmy just launched it in v0.19 yesterday, so you’ll have to wait for the people running your instance (in your case, the Beehaw mods) to update it. Looks like Beehaw is still running v0.18.4.

        • jcarax@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, and to be fair, I have no problem with folks being what makes them happy. But the, uhh… enthusiasm makes it hard to avoid.

    • Mnglw@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think people should know those are just mutes

      its like that on mastodon too, user domain blocks won’t actually protect you from harassment or your data being vacuumed

      • Gestrid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Still, if people don’t interact with Threads content, that effectively keeps them separate.

        Also, come to think of it, what’s keeping companies from “vacuuming” everyone’s data without actually having a public instance that has users interacting with posts on other instances? Example: Instance A exists. What’s stopping a company that runs Instance B, which doesn’t have any active users on it, from taking all the available data from Instance A? Genuine question, by the way. I haven’t exactly kept up with the technical workings of Lemmy very well.

        • fer0n@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I have the same question. Lemmy and Mastodon are both public and as of yet, no one was able to tell me what “privacy” actually looks like for data in that context. Other than the fact that Meta will destroy it. It’s public, anyone can access it already.

          • Mnglw@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            that is not true, at least in mastodon’s case. Mastodon has unlisted, followers only and direct messages those are visible for the instance admins if your account federates to them. That is concerning. I don’t need Zuck to suck up my private posts

            • fer0n@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              While that’s true, I’m not sure how many people are using Mastodon that way and if that’s actually the main concern. In the end it still is meant to be a public platform. Not on the same level of “private messages and photos” where most people would probably be very concerned.