• Tavarin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    The electors only exist because it made it possible to hold a vote across a large nation in a time when horses were the fastest mode of communication. And each elector was supposed to carry the results of the same number of voters.

    But the country has grown, with some states growing in population much faster than others. Yet the number of electors remains unchanged. Not to mention electors are now completely unnecessary as we have fast and reliable communication methods.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You can disagree with the electoral college and still recognize that electors are literally representatives.

      This is basic civics.

      • Tavarin
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        But they aren’t really, they’re just vote messengers, they aren’t on capital hill making laws and advocating for their constituents.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          All representatives are “vote messengers.” That’s why we call them representatives.

          • Tavarin
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I would disagree that senators and congressmen are just vote messengers. They run on active platforms, respond to changes in their constituencies (hopefully), deal with new issues as they arise.

            Electors literally just ferry the states vote to Washington, that’s it and job done. Representatives continually represent the will of their constituents through multiple years, or at least that’s what they are supposed to do.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              respond to changes in their constituencies

              Yes. This is being a representative.

              • Tavarin
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yes, and how exactly do electors do that on an ongoing basis?

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  They do it when they’re in the role.

                  Why are you so passionate about something so simple? This entire conversation is confusing to me, in terms of intent.

                  • Tavarin
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    And what about the other 1200+ days they aren’t in the role for each 1 they are in it?

                    Why are you so passionate in misusing the term representative?

                    Representatives are more than just vote carriers.