• Rediphile
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    We don’t need to know for it to be deterministic.

    • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Fwiw I agree, the concept of “true randomness” never set well with me… often we use probability to model systems that are too complex to understand or calculate directly. However, in this case I defer my personal beliefs to genius scientists and mathematicians who have spent their whole lives exploring just this dilemma. So far we have no deterministic model for quantum mechanics, and no indication that such exists.

      (not an expert or formally educated on the subject, but I recommend reading A Brief History of Time for an accessible overview)

      • Rediphile
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        A good while back we had no working model for a heliocentric solar system nor any solid indication of it…until we did. But I’m pretty sure the earth was going around the sun even before we realized it, and even before we existed at all.

        A Brief History of Time was great! I’d also definitely recommend it to all.

    • DarkGamer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Outcomes must be knowable/predictable if it is deterministic. Things could have played out differently at least at small scales, which often have large effects.