Could Bitcoin Millhouse be even less likeable? Yes, the answer is yes.

  • Splitdipless
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’ll take the party that is marginally better than the rest. Why wouldn’t you select the best option?

    • Nik282000
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Would you rather be punched in the face, neck, or balls? There is no best option. The options are 3 parties who will, without a doubt, make this country less livable to varying degrees.

      • Splitdipless
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Sorry buddy, but being dragged up and offered where to be punched, I’m absolutely exercising my right to choose (and to be honest, I’m kind of thinking neck at the moment). I refuse to be a sad sack that gets punched in the balls and laments that there was no other option.

        • Nik282000
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Proud to choose a punch in the neck because at least it wasn’t the balls! Our political system is woefully broken.

          • Splitdipless
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            We have systems for that. We can join the various ‘teams’ of people doing the punching and we can, as a group, demand that they change their practices - next convention the group votes on replacing ball punches with a hearty ‘punchbuggy’ to the shoulder. Several leaders run and make promises on how hearty to make that shoulder-punch, and we select someone for the next election between face, neck and shoulder. You don’t get to complain about where the 3 parties are punching if you aren’t in there telling them to change their target - otherwise you got party die-hards saying things like “we’ve always punched to the neck, and that’s what Canadians want.”