cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/9405812

“We are going to do something that I will say is slightly controversial but it shouldn’t be. We are going to indemnify policemen and precincts and states and cities from being sued. We want them to do their job. Our police and law enforcement has to come back and they want to come back and they want to do their job. And we are going to indemnify them so they don’t lose their wife, their family, their pension, and their job. We are going to indemnify policemen and law enforcement. We are going to tell them to get out, we love you, do your job.” – Trump, speaking last night at the New York Young Republicans Club gala.

Trump going after the tyrant vote.

  • @nova_ad_vitum
    link
    615 months ago

    Of all the 60+ million people who intend to vote for him next year, this ridiculous rhwtoric will dissuade exactly none of them.

    Meanwhile the left needs to be cajoled and won over and made to feel special just to get them to the fucking polling station.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      405 months ago

      BuT BiDeN nEeDs To EaRn My VoTe!

      If we manage to avoid a fascist takeover, it will be in spite of the naive progressive idealogues who think they have the privilege to vote their conscience.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        135 months ago

        It’s the political reality that you need the votes of people to your left who you hate. Get to it.

        I’m already voting for Biden. You’ll scream at me anyway because you don’t want to treat voters you need as though you need their votes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          125 months ago

          people to your left who you hate

          I don’t hate them. I said certain ones are naive (aggravatingly so, to clarify further). Too many people talk and act as if they can choose this time and keep that ability to choose next time.

          If you have the sense to see what you stand to lose in this dumb FPTP system, then we are in the same boat. I understand the desire to have your elected leaders actually do something progressive, or doing something that makes you truly proud of them.

          But as someone said, voting is a chess move, not a love letter.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            105 months ago

            I don’t hate them. I said certain ones are naive (aggravatingly so, to clarify further). Too many people talk and act as if they can choose this time and keep that ability to choose next time.

            in the time that I’ve been voting… the US has only slid right. The democrats have done exceedingly little to halt that.

            Rear guard delaying actions, to use the military parlance, do not win wars. Biden is moderate only in consideration that the GOP are so much further to the right as to actively embrace fascism. We cannot keep acting as we always have and expect something to magically fix itself. So now is the time to start changing how we vote and the people we send to be voted for.

            it’s really that simple.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              15 months ago

              It’s not. We are four years too late. We need to prevent a fascist takeover, then try to make progress.

              • FuglyDuck
                link
                fedilink
                English
                65 months ago

                That is what they said last time, too. Complete with a promise of “one term”

                Why should anyone believe you (and Biden) this time?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  45 months ago

                  That is what they said last time, too. Complete with a promise of “one term”

                  Why should anyone believe you (and Biden) this time?

                  What alternative do you have? What viable plan can you enact to change the likely outcome and still avoid fascism?

                  • FuglyDuck
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -15 months ago

                    “you’ll vote for who we tell you, and you’ll like it. By the way. You can either choose [objectively bad] or [worse] candidates. HOW DARE YOU ask for better.”

                    that all you’re saying. You’re arguments are unconvincing… and not even addressing the point: with BIDEN/the ‘moderate’ democrats… we’re still sliding into fascism. Just not as fast as we would with Trump. So. are you really concerned about fascism… or do you just want it on your terms?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  35 months ago

                  And the time before that, and the time before that…… it’s literally what they say every four years.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    2
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    I don’t know about that, I’ve been paying attention since 2004ish and I don’t remember Romney being portrayed as a destroyer of democracy, his big thing was “binders of women” and tying his dog to the roof of his car… Lol Same with McCain, our biggest issue with McCain was Palin and the absolute joke of a person she is with all the newspapers she definitely totally reads.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              05 months ago

              in the time that I’ve been voting… the US has only slid right. The democrats have done exceedingly little to halt that.

              They can’t do anything as the minority, and as the majority they need 60 Senate votes to do anything more meaningful than budget reconciliation. Our country is designed to make change difficult, as the Senate filibuster proves. We would need 50 Senate votes to change that, and Democrats fell barely short in 2020. The most change they’ve been able to do is with Obamacare when they had a 60 seat majority for 2 months. Those 2 months are the only time in recent history Democrats have had a commanding majority, but even then they were still beholden to centrists like Lieberman to maintain the 60 count.

              There’s a vicious cycle in American politics. Democrats will win the majority when Republicans massively fuck up. They’ll pass legislation that can’t be more progressive unless we have more senators. Voters will be unhappy the legislation isn’t better, staying home and leading Republicans to win. Republicans see their extremism as vindicated and are emboldened. We’ve seen this happen twice already. First with the Tea Party in 2010, second with Trumpism in 2016. When Republicans win, they drive us right.

              Both parties are shaped more by their wins than their losses. Romney in '12 and Trump in '16 show this really well. If we want to push the party and the country to left, we have no choice but to continue voting.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                They can’t do anything as the minority

                And won’t do what they campaigned on as the majority.

                Our country is designed to make change difficult, as the Senate filibuster proves. We would need 50 Senate votes to change that, and Democrats fell barely short in 2020.

                Democrats will always fall barely short. They will always stand in their own way. There are always enough manchins.

                They’ll pass legislation that can’t be more progressive unless we have more senators

                So goes the excuse, yes. No matter how great the majority, centrists always find enough no votes.

              • FuglyDuck
                link
                fedilink
                English
                05 months ago

                This is such a bullshit take it kind of pisses me off. Let me explain.

                First, the only reason democrats have as much trouble in federal elections is all the freaking time is because they do Jack shit to support local campaigns. Which, leads to republicans gerrymandering the fuck out of districts.

                Also, leads to a dire lack of new and up-coming canidates to source from… leading to the same lackluster “always been around” canidates that are unappealing.

                But democrats, as a voting block, are not actually minorities. But they struggle getting the vote out precisely because a) there’s little support for local campaigns and b) the federal canidates are… rather underwhelming.

                There’s exceptions who’ve managed to get there in spite of the DNC/national leadership.

                But they’d never get the presidential nomination because actual progressives scare the fuck out of their corpo overlords.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  35 months ago

                  they do Jack shit to support local campaigns

                  Be fair. They support centrists when they have progressive primary challengers.

                  • FuglyDuck
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    25 months ago

                    you’re right. And of course the centrist looses because “I’m not that or that” is a really bad platform to be on.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  25 months ago

                  I appreciate your response nonetheless and that you were civil towards me even if you disliked my opinion. Genuinely, thank you for that.

                  I do think you touch on some good points about local candidates and support. I think things are better now, but I do distinctly recall that it was lacking for a good part of 2008 - Present.

                  When it comes to federal candidates, I honestly think it’s a mix – yes, the candidates could stand to be better and a lot more appealing. I don’t think it’s a mistake that the more charismatic and friendly Democrat candidates have done well. I think too though that voter responsibility is a consideration. Even if the candidates are less than stellar, it’s important to go vote, because the less stellar Democrat is still better than the best Republican. I think the best way to look at it is that both ends need to be responsible – there need to be candidates that are genuine and spirited in some regard. And blue voters need to vote for them even if there’s room for improvement.

                  There’s never going to be a perfect candidate – but that doesn’t mean we can’t have a good candidate. I didn’t quite appreciate that second part until what you said. I don’t think it changes my view about voting for Biden, but it does help me understand the consternation about it more. I can see what you mean by being tired of all the voting, just for things to be where they are. It can be a two pronged effort to both inspire voters with a good candidate and encourage voters to show up. I think the idea of a shared responsibility makes the whole nomination process and campaigning feel more like a partnership with the voter, which it should feel like.

                  I don’t know about a progressive candidate never getting the nomination either – I don’t think any barriers they could put up would stop a really good candidate. Their strength is overstated, I think. Maybe I’m just refusing to accept a pessimistic reality, but if we don’t fight like we have a chance, we aren’t going to have a chance. Corpo overlords are only invulnerable if we think they are.

                  This is a tangent, but I saw it happen before, when I worked for a petrochemical company. Consumer goods manufacturers were pledging to stop using single use plastics because customers were demanding them to be more sustainable. It would’ve been devastating to my company’s revenue if that happened, so corporate started looking at how to reliably recycle plastics and reuse them all the way on the chemical feedstock level. Collective bargaining is incredibly powerful.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    15 months ago

                    Consumer goods manufacturers were pledging to stop using single use plastics because customers were demanding them to be more sustainable. It would’ve been devastating to my company’s revenue if that happened, so corporate started looking at how to reliably recycle plastics and reuse them all the way on the chemical feedstock level.

                    I hope everyone actually moves away from single use plastics. Instead of making pledges they have no intention of honoring and “looking into” things they’ll never actually do.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            I don’t hate them.

            Don’t lie to me. I know how you’ve responded to me in the past when I didn’t include that I was voting for Biden in my comment.

            I understand the desire to have your elected leaders actually do something progressive, or doing something that makes you truly proud of them.

            I very much doubt that.

            But as someone said, voting is a chess move, not a love letter.

            And the move expected of the progressives you hate is always “forfeit.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          And you need the votes of people to your right who you hate. That’s the political reality of it. It’s a two way street, and both progressives and moderates see it as a one way.

          I get to see that a lot because I have the same goals and desires of progressives (which is why I consider myself one), but I think we should achieve them with plans grounded in reality that are based on systems and practices we already know work. That aligns more with how the moderates do things. In short, I just want to reach the outcome in the best way possible, without any unpleasant surprises.

          I expect something snarky in response to that, but I hope I’m wrong. Because as much as you may dislike me I’m the vote, directly to your right, that you need. Do you believe your words to apply fairly to everyone, or just the groups you dislike?

          Edit: And just to be clear, I really see no reason for us to be adversarial. I want the same goals as you at the end of the day, and given you’re voting for Biden, I think our thoughts on the methods aren’t all that different either.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            55 months ago

            And you need the votes of people to your right who you hate.

            The party has you covered. They have spent the past half a century moving to the right to appeal to the centrists and try, Chamberlain-like, to appease Republicans. If the party ever does something that its pampered right flank dislikes in the slightest, then I’ll start talking about how we need to keep their votes.

            The last time that happened was when the voters overcame the party’s attempt to coronate Clinton and nominated Obama instead. The Clinton wing of the party formed a PAC to try to elect McCain and Palin. Obama, always eager to capitulate to his right, actually tried to get their votes back by selecting a moderate as his VP pick. Clinton selected the anti-choice Tim Kaine as her VP pick as a “fuck you, you’ll vote for me cause you gotta” to the left. Biden chose the war on drugs DA as his VP.

            Because as much as you may dislike me I’m the vote, directly to your right, that you need. Do you believe your words to apply fairly to everyone, or just the groups you dislike?

            The party does what you want already. You have a party that represents you. The left has a party that opposes them and orders them to vote for them anyway.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              15 months ago

              I already told you, I sit between progressives and moderates because I have the same goals as progressives and the same methods as moderates (or at least what would be considered a slower and measured process).

              You’ve also avoided my question, I’m not talking about who the party appeals to here. There’s already plenty of discussion about what moderates do. I want to know what you think about how progressives should build coalitions. Believe it or not, I want to see progressives win. I’m asking how they should appeal to moderates and earn their votes for a general election once they win a primary – without completely capitulating to the center.

              Progressives and Democrat moderates/establishment need each other to win elections, and as you’ve aptly pointed out, they don’t value that. There’s going to come a time in the next few decades where the dynamics flip though, and progressives have more power. How should we act differently then – if at all? It’s perfectly valid to say they can reap what they sow and also be taken for granted. I just think there’s a real opportunity in cooperation instead to have a strong electoral alliance.

              If it isn’t clear, I have no desire to be adversarial with you, just genuine discussion. I don’t agree with everything you say necessarily, but there’s enough I agree with on some level that my being a dick is getting in the way of learning your perspective. And along those lines – sorry that I’ve been a dick to you, especially with how I ignored you saying you’ll vote for Biden just so I could make witty arguments and quips. That was disrespectful and also utterly counterproductive.

              • FuglyDuck
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                I already told you, I sit between progressives and moderates because I have the same goals as progressives and the same methods as moderates (or at least what would be considered a slower and measured process).

                You know, that makes you a conservative right? Slowing progress and social change is the heart of conservatism. (In reality republican “conservatives” are in fact regressive- which is why they got rid of RvW, want to get rid of Obama care, and deregulate every regulation curtailing corporates.)

                Just something for you to think about.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  0
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  I should probably clarify what I mean. Healthcare for example – I have no qualms about instantly moving to a Medicare for All system, or establishing a copy of say the UK or German system.

                  My caution would be on what comes after that. Currently pretty much every universal healthcare system has a form of supplemental private insurance for those who want it. I wouldn’t immediately support abolishing all insurance, because that’s untread ground. I would however immediately support commissioning studies to figure out what it would look like and if there’s any unexpected issues that come up. Alternatively, if someone else tests it and things look good, then let’s immediately jump to abolishing insurance.

                  For a lot of American issues actually there wouldn’t be much difference. We have plenty to catch up on. We could adopt European systems without any concern.

                  I think my mentality probably applies more with climate change, where I don’t want the government to start building large scale fusion reactors when we really haven’t proved out the technology. Or, deploying a chemical additive in the atmosphere to absorb CO2, without extensive studies on the after effects. I don’t want us to create an even bigger problem with the solution.

                  EDIT: And to be clear, when I say we shouldn’t immediately ban all private insurance, that’s not out of love for those companies. It’s to figure out how we smoothly transition everyone currently working in that industry to a new job. I don’t want a situation where all of those workers suddenly become unemployed or are thrown to the wolves.

                  • FuglyDuck
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    15 months ago

                    I appreciate the clarification there. thank you.

                    I think my mentality probably applies more with climate change, where I don’t want the government to start building large scale fusion reactors when we really haven’t proved out the technology. Or, deploying a chemical additive in the atmosphere to absorb CO2, without extensive studies on the after effects. I don’t want us to create an even bigger problem with the solution.

                    Just a minor point, I don’t think any progressives are actually pushing for fusion (it’s only barely gotten past break-even in billions of dollars worth of global investment.) if we wanted to talk about fission… there’s some new technologies there that don’t have all of the draw backs of classic fusion; and their modularity could be a reasonable solution for places that wind or solar aren’t. (they’re being developed, for example, to power giant container ships).

                    same goes with any form of carbon capture. The feeling I have (and seems to be echoed by most) is that carbon capture is great and all, but it’s basically an excuse for companies to just not change what they’re doing; and it’s siphoning funds from actual solutions. I would like to see some carbon capture happen, but not at the expense of actually solving the problem.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                I already told you, I sit between progressives and moderates because I have the same goals as progressives and the same methods as moderates (or at least what would be considered a slower and measured process).

                The latter is designed to make sure the former never happens.

                There’s going to come a time in the next few decades where the dynamics flip though, and progressives have more power.

                If Democrats do not alter course, they will alienate enough of the votes that they needed and Republicans will win before that happens. Maybe not this election, maybe not the next one. But our current messaging won’t succeed forever, and it won’t carry us to the future in which progressives have any power. And we know what Republicans’ plans are. There won’t be meaningful elections after that.

                How should we act differently then – if at all?

                There won’t be a then if the party maintains its current heading

                It’s perfectly valid to say they can reap what they sow and also be taken for granted.

                It certainly is. They should sow other crops.

                I just think there’s a real opportunity in cooperation instead to have a strong electoral alliance.

                That opportunity exists today, and I fear it will not exist in the future. Centrists refuse to seize it, and progressives are not in a position to. If you want magnanimity, lead by example. Like this:

                And along those lines – sorry that I’ve been a dick to you, especially with how I ignored you saying you’ll vote for Biden just so I could make witty arguments and quips. That was disrespectful and also utterly counterproductive.

                This shows a capacity for introspection and humility that centrists are often too proud or antagonistic to display. Apology accepted.

                • FuglyDuck
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  15 months ago

                  If Democrats do not alter course, they will alienate enough of the votes that they needed and Republicans will win before that happens. Maybe not this election, maybe not the next one. But our current messaging won’t succeed forever, and it won’t carry us to the future in which progressives have any power. And we know what Republicans’ plans are. There won’t be meaningful elections after that.

                  And we’re the problem for warning them about that. It’s hilarious. It’s only working because of how horrible trump is. If the pubies trotted any one less horrible, we’d loose.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    15 months ago

                    And we’re the problem for warning them about that. It’s hilarious.

                    They’d rather have Trump than appeal to the left.

                    It’s only working because of how horrible trump is. If the pubies trotted any one less horrible, we’d loose.

                    If Republicans nominate someone other than Trump, he’ll run as a third party candidate and split the “stupid bigot” vote. It’s the best we could hope for, considering that Democrats’ only message right now is “fuck you, you’re voting for us.” Any Democrat who doesn’t have a compelling reason to vote in the Democratic Party primaries for lower offices than president should be voting in the Republican presidential primaries.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  05 months ago

                  I fear we haven’t definitively avoided the point where infighting between Democrats and progressives makes us blind to a fascist threat. So it’s more than fair for me to do my part when I’ve been a dick and perpetuated the problem.

                  My hope is that Republicans lose by so much in 2024 that it effectively destroys the party, and by the time we’re sure they’re gone, the Democrats can split into proper moderate and progressive parties. It’s definitely wishful thinking, but we live in unusual times. Democrats should’ve lost badly in the midterms, but they actually came out ahead in the Senate and won some important state races.

                  It’s also worth noting that we will need methodical planning grounded in reality and science to achieve the goals we want. We just need to do it genuinely and not to stifle progress. We can do what’s already worked for other countries fairly instantly, but we should exercise caution in making further improvements. We can still put together a test plan however to confirm any additional improvements will be successful.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    15 months ago

                    It’s also worth noting that we will need methodical planning grounded in reality and science to achieve the goals we want. We just need to do it genuinely and not to stifle progress.

                    I have no faith that stifling progress isn’t the party’s only goal.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        look, you can say what you want about progressives. Just know, I think you believe you have the privilege of dictating who I vote for… which is not democracy, and you can go fuck off with trump (who, believe it or not, shares that belief.)

        You want people to vote for your candidate? you should maybe not piss them off first. Besides which, right now, it’s the primary and not even about Biden vs Trump. for the DNC, it’s a question of which candidate is the best.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          Interestingly enough, the DNC is actively subverting the primary elections in every state they can. They don’t want primary elections because they know how incredibly unpopular Biden is, and yet they insist he is the only one who can beat Trump. I disagree emphatically - Biden is the only one who can lose to him, and we are hurtling towards that terrible outcome due to corrupt establishment politics.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            Well, I wouldn’t say Biden is the only one who can loose… There’s others right up there with him in that. but those ones are all basically the same, so I don’t know that it makes all that much in difference.

            I wouldn’t be surprised to find they’ve always meddled and outright cheated in primaries to keep progressives out.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              35 months ago

              Yeah I suspect there is a long and storied history of this happening. If there’s one thing all the corporate shills in DC can agree on, it’s that progressives represent a threat to their very way of life. Imagine, politicians who would fight for regular people, instead of corporate interests. O, the humanity…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      245 months ago

      Get better messaging, then. Screaming at them ain’t gonna work.

      Scream at me for pointing it out. It beats trying to get votes.

      (I’m voting for Biden. “Not Trump” has convinced me. It won’t convince all the voters you’ll need to win, and you’d rather lose than stop punching left.)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          In concert with campaign promises that haven’t borne fruit, mainly due to Democrats getting in their own way. Now we’re down to just “not Trump”. I think relying on that message alone is doomed to fail. If you don’t think we need better messaging or even additional messaging, fine.

          But don’t blame people to whom you are hostile when they don’t enthusiastically vote like you want.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            15 months ago

            Imagine being upset that your candidate has to actually have good policy proposals that voters support in order to get votes.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              35 months ago

              I mean, I feel like most people are pretty upset about it. I’m pretty upset I have to vote for Biden in order to vote against Trump, but I’m still gonna do it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            05 months ago

            mainly due to Democrats getting in their own way.

            This is the “only Democrats have agency” thing, yes? To blame them for failing while ignoring all the Republicans who actively oppose progress.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              I don’t expect Republicans to vote with Democrats. I don’t expect Democrats to vote with Republicans. Just enough Democrats do anyway.

    • DigitalTraveler42
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 months ago

      It’s easy, the Right are fanatics doing fanatic things, the Left haven’t had something to be “fanatical” about since Obama, Biden has done a great job for the most part, obviously with some disappointment here and there, no presidency is perfect, but Old man Biden just doesn’t excite people, and it’s only Trump keeping him running, if Don the Con would go to prison and stop running we’d be able to hopefully elect somebody under 60, and most of those Republican candidates are just as scary as Trump, and bless Chris Christie and Liz Chaney for finally committing political suicide by fighting against the fascism in their party, especially after enabling it for so long.