• @MrGG
    link
    English
    36 months ago

    I’m in awe of how confident you are.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -26 months ago

      And why wouldn’t I be? The person who claimed that Source2 was basically Quake1 at its core had two bits of “proof”, the Valve wiki that refers to “some residual Quake code” and light flickering pattern. That’s it. Suddenly it’s just “semantics”. Yeah, right. Valve developers referred to CS2 as a completely new engine. That’s not semantics, that’s not splitting hairs, that’s straight of Valve’s mouth.