• HikingVet
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s new, and they bought into the idea that because it’s new it’s bad.

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I guarantee they were fed at least in part by conspiracy theories off of Facebook, spread by pro-oil groups. The article mentions something about older, more toxic battery systems which these were confused for.

      Because it’s new and green, and green is for sissies!

      • nyan@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Lithium batteries are complicated, and the article is not very specific. I assume this site was going to use LiFePO4, which is no more unstable than NiMH, but the other chemistries, like lithium-cobalt, tend to catch on fire when mishandled. Guess which is on the news more, and therefore which a group of people who weren’t interested in battery chemistries would have heard of? 🙄

    • MeowWeHaveAProblem@toast.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ya, thats probably true. I always hope there is some type of rational thought to this behavior that I havent thought of. But I doubt it here. Only thing I can think of is they wouldn’t like the look of it. Hardly a reason to go as far as dealth threats…