@[email protected] to Green [email protected]English • 5 months agoHuge Turbines Will Soon Bring First Offshore Wind Power to New Yorkerswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up122arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up121arrow-down1external-linkHuge Turbines Will Soon Bring First Offshore Wind Power to New Yorkerswww.nytimes.com@[email protected] to Green [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@jjagaimolinkEnglish3•5 months agoAccording to their website 12 turbines generating a total of 132MW => 11MW each So not the largest available but then again that’s likely better for cost
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•5 months agoLooks like about 2MW is average for on shore, so these are still massive! https://css.umich.edu/publications/factsheets/energy/wind-energy-factsheet
minus-squareMaëlyslinkfedilink2•5 months agowhats the repercussions of this footprint wise? According to google a 2Mw turbine requires 0.006 km², so a 0.33Gwc of capacity per km². i wonder also how long does a windmill work per day, when averaged yearly …
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•edit-25 months agoStill pretty amazing. Means each turbine alone will power around 10k homes.
According to their website 12 turbines generating a total of 132MW => 11MW each
So not the largest available but then again that’s likely better for cost
Looks like about 2MW is average for on shore, so these are still massive! https://css.umich.edu/publications/factsheets/energy/wind-energy-factsheet
whats the repercussions of this footprint wise? According to google a 2Mw turbine requires 0.006 km², so a 0.33Gwc of capacity per km². i wonder also how long does a windmill work per day, when averaged yearly …
Still pretty amazing. Means each turbine alone will power around 10k homes.
deleted by creator