• o2inhaler
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would argue happiness is profitable, but would have to shared amongst the people. Killer robots are profitable for a concentrated group of people

    • Meowing Thing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      What if we gave everyone their own killer robot and then everyone could just fight each other for what they wanted?

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          No the Republican plan would be to sell killer robots at a vastly inflated price to guarantee none but the rich can own them, and then blame people for “being lazy” when they can’t afford their own killer robot.

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Also, they would say that the second amendment very obviously covers killer robots. The founding fathers definitely foresaw the AI revolution, and wanted to give every man and woman the right to bear killer robots.

          • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’d say they’re gonna pass a law to give every male, property owning citizen a killer robot but first they have to pass a law saying it’s legal to own killer robots. They pass that law then all talk about the other law is dropped forever. No one ever follows up or asks what happened to it. Meanwhile, the rich buy millions and millions of killer robots.