“Not every item within [the plastic manufactured items category] has the potential to create a reasonable apprehension of harm”

As long as we agree not to be apprehensive about the harms resulting from the use and manufacture of all plastics, they are ok. Got it, bring back the straws and stir sticks!

The challenge to the federal government’s proposed ban was brought last year by the Responsible Plastic Use Coalition (RPUC) and several chemical companies. They argued that the federal government had failed to demonstrate that it had enough scientific evidence to justify the regulations. RPUC was formed in 2021 in response to the “toxic” designation, and currently includes more than 30 processors and resin makers, including Berry Global Group Inc., CCC Plastics, Dow Inc., Ingenia Polymers, IPL, LyondellBasell Industries, and Nova Chemicals Corp.

https://www.canplastics.com/canplastics/judge-quashes-cabinet-order-underlying-canadas-single-use-plastic-ban/1003462513/

  • ILikeBoobies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, but currently (post court case) nothing can be done at all. A warning label is better than that, also we would have single use banned and then a label on everything else

    Both are better than nothing

    • baconisaveg
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with Prop 65 is everything has a warning label now, which kind of defeats the purpose.