The population of Canada is expected to hit 40 million within the next day or two, according to StatCan’s modelling.

  • monkeedude1212
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s a bit of a chicken and egg scenario; people don’t want to live out in the boonies in the middle of nowhere, they like amenities like “restaurants” and “clothing stores”. Maybe even a super market that can stock a few international ingredients from home.

    Who is going to build all that infrastructure to prop up a new town before the residents move in?

    Free crown land costs you nothing because just trying to live there means you’ll be doing some of the developing.

    Affordable housing isn’t even an immigration problem, it also gets tied to birth rates as a population spike.

    This is just a failure of the free market to address the needs of the populace, and is evidence that housing either needs to be provided by the government like any other see public service, or a public competitor needs to exist to drive prices down.

    • EhForumUser
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      This is just a failure of the free market to address the needs of the populace

      Yes, the failure of the free market to exist is understandably a problem. For example:

      • Municipal planning and zoning severely restricts where and what types of housing can be built.
      • Controls on immigration keeps out the immigrants who would actually see establishing new communities as a better life. In modern Canada, for all practical purposes we only let in rich immigrants who feel like they have better things to do.
      • Controls on immigration in other countries means it is difficult for us to leave.
      • Market manipulation (e.g. copyright) directs resources in bizarre ways, often away from people who need housing.

      The list goes on and on.

      I don’t know if I consider myself a free market type. I think smart regulation can be useful. But our specific attempt to avoid a free market is certainly broken, at least when optimizing for allowing housing for all. No doubt a free market would bring improvement over what we currently have for those in need of somewhere to live.