• zephyreks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    China’s a leader in terms of actually hitting their emissions targets (they’re hitting peak oil earlier than expected, for example), but they aren’t able to use the natural gas crutch to drive down “emissions.”

    Methane leaks absolutely destroy any GHGe advantage natural gas has in the short term, but it’s something that’s completely forgotten in emissions reporting. If you adjust for natural gas’ methane footprint, the GHGe reductions in the West start looking really depressing.

    • nathris
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      China, the country that is increasing the number of coal power plants they build every year?

      • zephyreks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, if someone else wants to start producing solar panels and wind turbines…

      • tleb
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        China just lies about every metric they report. GDP, emissions, poverty, etc.

      • zephyreks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, I’ve already established you can’t take Western GHGe numbers at face value… What’s your point? Trust nobody and nothing?

          • zephyreks
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The West’s data is literally, demonstrably false to the point that it’s legitimately harmful to our climate goals. In the short-term, natural gas is indisputably worse than coal, maybe even 2-3x worse. Even in the long-term, natural gas is worse than coal when looking at observed methane leakage rates. The US’ emissions reductions are a fucking lie.

            Meanwhile, China hasn’t exactly been hiding that they’re reliant on coal.

              • zephyreks
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                And a good chunk of Canadian emissions (about half) are due to O&G extraction and burning fossil fuels for transportation. It’s a simple problem to solve.

                • TheLordHumungus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  And destroy our economy. What about fuel for our cars and heating our homes? Getting food and necessities. Not all of us live in Vancouver Montreal or Toronto. I live in the north where people are having to choose between heating and eating. We need cars since there is a lack of decent public transportation. We need big trucks to deliver us everything. Once the turdhole government starts really cracking down, Alberta is gonna refuse the equalisation payments and eastern Canada is fucked. Same with BC if we stop mining, gas refining and cutting/processing and selling lumber. You wanna make a difference, axe the carbon tax that is unfair on a majority of Canadians and stop selling coal to China.

                  I bet you live in a big city because your lack of understanding what makes us our money is appalling.

                  • zephyreks
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    None of this solves the methane problem that has a disproportionate and untracked impact on Canada’s emissions.

                    Consider that 1.2% leakage means that natural gas is equally bad as coal over a 20 year period. Consider then that even the most optimistic estimates for leakage are higher than that. Might as well just burn coal.