• TotallyHuman
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Remember this moment the next time someone says that business people deserve wealth beyond the wildest dreams of avarice because they “took a risk”.

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The whole “took a risk” stuff is so dumb because in most cases what they risk is ending up with less money… which is still more than most people have throughout their lifetime.

      I’d feel totally safe risking 900 million USD if I already had 1 billion USD. What’s the worst that can happen, like, really?

      • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        To add on to that, what gives people a special right to be able to take “risks” like that in the first place? It’s not like the basis for risk taking is distributed in a way that most people can, so they’re taking advantage of most people not even being able to as well as it being little real risk.

        • FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          Just another way the game is rigged. If I spent every cent I had to create a risky startup, I’d be homeless. If someone from an affluent family spends every cent they have, they’d always be able to borrow life changing money (even 5k could change someone’s life) or move in to someone’s summer home, etc.

          • m0darn
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah it’s false to equate risk to investment.

            Risking 50 dollars is very different to a wage slave than to someone in the middle class.

            You have to look at the situation they’re risking putting themselves into, not the number of dollars or hours of labor they’re risking.

            It’s like when conservatives say they’re in favour of equality of opportunity (but not in favour equality of outcome, a total red herring but that’s a different rant). Like when has there ever been equality of opportunity?

      • Rodeo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The risk actually complete and utter bullshit anyway, especially if you’re operating under a corporation.

        Consider I take out $1m to start business. I buy a property and equipment for the business. I operate it for a year, make some money, then go bankrupt.

        The bank takes back the business assets and … That’s it. They can’t touch your personal assets unless you agreed to put them up as collateral. If it was a sole proprietorship your credit score goes to zero which sucks for a few years, but if it’s a corporation the company goes bankrupt and you walk away scot free.

        So I spent a year running a business, made some money, and wind up in the same place I started. What did I lose? Maybe a credit score and that’s it.

        If there is nothing to lose, then there is no risk.

    • whoisearth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Also remember these AirBnb owners are more often like you and I except absolute shitheads looking to exploit the market for their own personal gain.

      The problem may be partly those in charge but we need to point the finger at ourselves. We all bought into the same system that encourages this shitty behaviour.