• Steeve
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • papertowels@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, your anecdotal experiences are different, so they shouldn’t be used as a basis to influence or judge others.

      • Steeve
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • papertowels@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Was this anecdote included to justify the judgement?

          Alternatively, every hunter and farmer I know who hasn’t become fully disassociated (the majority of them) respects the animals they eat too much to do something like this.

          I’m not saying you’re wrong for judging others btw- just that in light of two equally anecdotal and contrasting experiences, the anecdotal evidence should not be included.

    • XbSuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never said it was made up, just that neither of our evidence is based on much.

      As for being cringey? Call it what you want, but those specific animals literally only exist because they’re delicious, and we want to eat them. It doesn’t matter if you don’t like it, it’s fact.

      Animals are here for us to enjoy. The exact meaning of that is up to each individual on this earth.