I was reading about the allegations against Russell Brand and couldn’t help but wonder how it works legally that his revenue can be blocked based on allegations and before any juridical ruling.

Don’t get me wrong I don’t know much about the guy and what he did or didn’t do and agree that anyone should be punished according to their crimes.

But how is this possible with the principal of innocent until proven guilty? I’d be happy if someone could explain me.

  • Grant_M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Google is a privately owned company. Brand could try to sue, but he doesn’t have a leg to stand on.