The Appropriation of ā€œRich Men North of Richmondā€

I heard on the radio that a new viral song has shot its way to the top of the charts, called ā€œRich Men in Richmondā€, and it has already soarked a bunch of controversy, being referenced at the Republican debate last night as an ā€œanthem of sortsā€, an anthem which ironically ridiculed the candidates on the stage, as the singer Oliver Anthony to point out in a public address later.

However, interestingly enough this sort of appropriation of country songs as ā€œanthemsā€ for the authoritarian right has happened before, with Bruce Springsteenā€™s ā€œBorn in the USAā€. It was popular because of a similar economic cry for relief, at least until it got coopted by Reagan.

Born in the USA by Springsteen

Born down in a dead manā€™s town The first kick I took was when I hit the ground You end up like a dog thatā€™s been beat too much ā€˜Til you spend half your life just coverinā€™ up

Got in a little hometown jam So they put a rifle in my hand Sent me off to a foreign land To go and kill the yellow man

Come back home to the refinery Hiring man says, ā€œSon if it was up to meā€ Went down to see my V.A. man He said, ā€œSon, donā€™t you understandā€

Down in the shadow of the penitentiary Out by the gas fires of the refinery Iā€™m ten years burning down the road Nowhere to run ainā€™t got nowhere to go

The song is basically about a small town rural man who grows up living a rough life, which leaves him with many physical and psychological scars that he has to ā€œspend half his life just covering upā€. He then was drafted to the military to go fight off in the Vietnam War. After a few years of fighting a needless war, he returns home to find a job, only to be turned away because all the jobs have dried up. Desperate to survive, he goes to the Veteranā€™s Administration (VA) to get assistance, but is presumably turned away because the VA is underfunded, and he is eventually forced to go to prison, reduced to burning away his potential as he is used and firgitten by the same America he fought to protect.

The song is made more ironic by the fact that he echoes ā€œBorn in the USA,ā€ which implies that as an American he should be achieving the American Dream, but he definitely doesnā€™t achieve them as his potential is wasted away in a jail cell, among the most forgotten in society.

Springsteenā€™s song poignantly pointed out the realities of being a poor white American citizen, and this struck a chord as the song skyrocketed to popularity, so much so that Ronald Reagan mentioned him in a presidential speech, and used his song to appeal to millions of Americans to win in a landslide in 1984, using the songā€™s appeal to white Americans and its connection to patriotism. It is still used today at some right leaning rallies as a quintessentiallu american sonf

Rich Men North of Richmond by Anthony

Iā€™ve been sellinā€™ my soul, workinā€™ all day Overtime hours for bullshit pay So I can sit out here and waste my life away Drag back home and drown my troubles away

Itā€™s a damn shame what the worldā€™s gotten to For people like me and people like you Wish I could just wake up and it not be true But it is, oh, it is Livinā€™ in the new world With an old soul These rich men north of Richmond Lord knows they all just wanna have total control Wanna know what you think, wanna know what you do And they donā€™t think you know, but I know that you do 'Cause your dollar ainā€™t shit and itā€™s taxed to no end 'Cause of rich men north of Richmond

I wish politicians would look out for miners And not just minors on an island somewhere Lord, we got folks in the street, ainā€™t got nothinā€™ to eat And the obese milkinā€™ welfare Well, God, if youā€™re five-foot-three and youā€™re three-hundred pounds Taxes ought not to pay for your bags of Fudge Rounds Young men are puttinā€™ themselves six feet in the ground ā€˜Cause all this damn country does is keep on kickinā€™ them down

Meanwhile, ā€œRich Men North of Richmondā€ has a similar theme and topic of exploitation, this time from the ā€œrich menā€. Although it approaches it from a different manner, this time the enemy is more defined, namely rich people.

The chorus is a successor to Springsteenā€™s song, being that the singer is an ā€œold soulā€ living in a "new worldā€™. He still experiences a similar hard rural life, having to work hard long hours for ā€œbulls*** payā€, and ā€œwaste his life awayā€.

This is because of the rich people who want to ā€œhave total control over your lifeā€ and know everything you do, extracting you for every penny you are worth.

He then goes on to slam the politicians for not looking out for rural people like them, and goes on to blame ā€œobese people milking welfareā€, an obviously very offensive and stereotypical remark that actually hides a deeper truth to the pain the singer expresses. To cope with the pain, they can tend to ā€œkick downā€ on other groups, like obese people, who they think are the reason why they donā€™t have enough to survive. They perceive the whole world as against them, ā€œkicking them downā€ and never giving them a chance, which can kill them in the pricess. Historically, this has been the case, as more urban areas got the economic benefit of industrialization, and rural areas have been left to fend for themselves, whether it be coal miners trying to unionize; or farmers toiling the soil, trying to compete against Big Agriculture, or small town people struggling to find jobs in rust belts.

Comparisons and Remarks

Both Anthonyā€™s and Springsteenā€™s songs expeess the plight of rural and poor white male Americans very well. However, they express it in different ways.

Anthonyā€™s song is a variant of Springsteenā€™s which criticizes the current festering plight of white rural and lower class American, yet again, as it highlights the wealth inequality which leaves many families struggling to survive. It also tends to more directly address the causes of this plight, targeting the rich, politicians, and those who do not pay fairly.

This is different from Springsteenā€™s story, which is more about the hardships and experiences of life, and more implicitly pointed the American government at that time as the enemy. It chronicles the journey of a forgotten soldier, and how their American Dream was never realized, but constantly teased in front of them.

Because of the mass emotional appeals of these country songs, they have always been targets of right-wing politicians, to make them seem like they are a part of the in group, when in reality, they use people to get and stay in office (note that both of these somgs were popular during presendential runs). So they co-opt the song and misconstrue the singerā€™s message so as to gain support.

Sorry this hasnā€™t been thought out too well, i just though an analysis would be interesting, please correct me if i did anything wrong.

Edit: corrected Springstein to Springsteen Edit 2: the person in the Springsteen song was drafted, so i corrected

  • ram
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    Oh 100%. None of them authentically believe in the message of either song, and even Oliver Anthony can realize that despite the money theyā€™re bringing in.

    I saw someone the other day conclude he was probably a conservative plant, and i think thereā€™s some truth to that, but I doubt he actually knew about it. Unfortunately though, he runs into a similar issue that a lot of poor conservatives do, thinking that those with even less than them are stealing from them their crumbs, but unlike them he also acknowledges that we only get crumbs in the first place.

    Every time these conservatives start using someoneā€™s music, it seems to always turn out that the artists actually really heavily oppose them. Funny how that is.