cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there’s still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

  • GreyEyedGhost
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sorry, I misread your post, and completely missed the last line (it was a long day). I thought you were arguing against this suggestion.

    I agree, taxes aren’t a huge part of the solution, and incentivizing high-density housing (as well as making them more palatable)is a bigger part of it.