• Showroom7561
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every time a cyclist lands in the ER with a smashed face, gets dragged underneath a car or is struck and killed by a truck, I want our politicians to look themselves in the mirror and swallow that guilty pill: This is not poor luck or bad drivers, it’s bad infrastructure.

    I would be very careful with that sentiment.

    In Toronto, there have been quite a few cases in the last year of bad drivers literally driving on isolated, protected bike lanes, or have smashed into and up concrete dividers designed to separate cars from cyclists.

    Good infrastructure won’t prevent accidents caused by bad drivers, and there are a LOT of bad drivers.

    • apprehensively_human
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ok so what’s the solution to bad drivers? Take away their license? All of them, before they hurt somebody?

      Take your average motorist and assume that half of them are worse than that. How exactly are these people supposed to exist without a car - without first changing the infrastructure?

      Quick edit for context: cars are the worst and the sooner we stop relying on them the better. But steps have to be made to slowly make that transition.

      • Victor Villas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Take away their license?

        Not issue licenses for them in the first place. That’s the intended purpose of licensing. I guess the solution to bad drivers is raising the bar on licensing.

        • apprehensively_human
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s still dodging the question about how they are supposed to live without being able to drive. Just having poor driving skills should not be enough to prevent someone from participating in society.

          Unless you’re lucky enough to have been born into a city with great public transit options, you’re screwed without a car. That isn’t fair.

          • Victor Villas
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re sidetracking a ridiculously simple issue. Having poor driving skills should prevent someone from driving. That’s as simple as it gets.

            • apprehensively_human
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is far from a simple issue. We have built ourselves a way of life that entirely revolves around having access to a car. Taking away someone’s car is akin to taking away their legs. Saying that they aren’t allowed a license to begin with is a prison sentence.

              I suggest that we need to make changes to city development that allows for alternate modes of transport such as walking and biking. Not just paths and sidewalks, but building the places you need to go closer to where you live.

              • Victor Villas
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m all in for reducing car dependency, my friend. I was just stating the obvious, because that’s how licensing already works. I understand that we can’t raise the bar arbitrarily high until only stunt drivers are able to pass, and we didn’t define what a “bad driver” is anyway.

          • Victor Villas
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I always assumed everyone would think of that, @apprehensively_human exemplifies the contrary, apparently.

      • alsimoneau
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. People should pass driver exams every 5 years, and police should be less lax with dangerous driving.

    • SkepticalButOpenMinded
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just because a solution isn’t perfect, doesn’t mean it’s not very very effective. The empirical evidence is clear and overwhelming. Well designed bike infrastructure absolutely works to increase safety.

      • Showroom7561
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well designed bike infrastructure absolutely works to increase safety.

        I agree completely, however, too many people make the wrong assumption that all you need is good cycling infrastructure and there won’t be any issues.

        We can see from the Dutch that even having the best cycling infrastructure in the world doesn’t prevent tens of thousands of injuries from happening per year, because not all accidents are between cyclist and motor vehicle.

        In fact, many don’t even involve another vehicle or person at all. And with e-bikes becoming more popular, the death and injury rates, even with the Dutch, have been increasing at a very rapid pace.

        Plus, I don’t believe much of the safety stats that come out of the Netherlands in relation to cycling. It seems they are just lying about the numbers..