• Cyborganism
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Doesn’t that go against net neutrality?

      • TheWoozy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Twitter is website that contains “links to” the other 5 websites. Those “links to other sites” are really links to Twitter scripts that do database queries before finally linking to the other sites for real. It is easy for elmo to insert delays in the process.

      • Cyborganism
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        It provides a service on the internet.

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Net neutrality is about Internet itself. Twitter/X is a service build on top of the Internet, so no.

      It is for example when your Internet provider Gomes you 100Mb/s, but only when accessing these particular sites, otherwise it’s 1Mb/s. It has nothing to do with data caps or overall speed limit, as some suggest, or with speed on the other end.

          • Cyborganism
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yes, actually. In Québec, Videotron offered a mobile data plan that included unlimited data exclusively for the Google Music service. The CRTC told them that this was illegal and it broke net neutrality laws.

            • JTode@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think I recall reading now that they had implemented it here. The whole “what happens there, happens here” dynamic made me cancel it out when they cancelled it down there I guess.