- cross-posted to:
- linux@programming.dev
- linux@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- linux@programming.dev
- linux@lemmy.world
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/62192988
The latest changes implemented in the Systemd repo, related to or prompted by age-verification laws, have made many people unhappy (I suppose links about this aren’t necessary). This has led to a surge in Systemd forks during the last days (“surge” because there have always been plenty of forks). Here are some forks that explicitly mention those changes as their reason for forking (rough time ordering taken from the fork page):
paramazo/systemd “The systemd System and Service Manager without age verification”
ganitam/systemd “Systemd fork just before the Age Verification addition. Hoping more capable developers and maintainers do same…”
GSYT-Productions/systemd-fork “The systemd System and Service Manager, without the stupid Age Verification”
speedythesnail/unre tarded-systemd “The systemd System and Service Manager, without the r e t arded age-verification commits”
ta13579/systemd “The systemd System and Service Manager WITHOUT THE FUCKING AGE CHECKS”
r4shsec/systemd-no-age-verification “This is systemd but without the age verification made via pull request https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/40978”
Pingasmaster/fightthesystemd “Systemd without the nonsense: no age verification, no lighthouse built-in.”
Jeffrey-Sardina/system “Liberated systemd – no surveillance. Ever.”
HaplessIdiot/systemd-saneagecheck “The systemd System and Service Manager with age verification bypass and polling rate options for said feature”
Queer-Coded-LGBTQ/systemd-fuck-california “The systemd System and Service Manager, but without age bs added in.”
Codiak540/unshitted-systemd “A fork of systemd aiming to strip the Age verification. Sue me california.”
Hopefully the energy of this reaction won’t be scattered among too many alternatives, although some amount of scattering is always good.
So I guess you’re saying you use “controversial” in a normative sense while I’m using it in a descriptive sense. We’re talking at slightly cross purposes. Maybe in itself this shouldn’t be controversial, but the political context in which it appears makes people worry.