Iran will completely shut the strategic Strait ​of Hormuz if Trump executes threats to target Iranian energy facilities, ​the country’s Revolutionary Guards ​said in a statement on ⁠Sunday.

Trump on Saturday threatened ​to “obliterate” Iran’s power plants ​if Tehran did not fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz within ​48-hours, suggesting a significant ​escalation barely a day after he ‌talked ⁠about “winding down” the war, now in its fourth week.

In their Sunday statement Iran’s ​Revolutionary ​Guards ⁠also said companies with U.S. shares will ​be ‘completely destroyed’, if Iranian ​energy ⁠facilities were targeted by Washington and energy facilities ⁠in ​countries that host ​U.S. bases will be ‘lawful’ targets.

  • circuscritic
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    So the tens of millions that are going to suffer famine across the global south, and the tens of thousands that will die in the third world hospitals without power, are price you’re willing to pay?

    Good to know.

    • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      No you illiterate fuck, I said I’d pay a little more at the pump to see one of the most narcissistic and dangerous world leaders get knocked down a peg or two on the world stage.

      It’s soul destroying seeing the human cost of such a conflict, but your virtue signalling is both misplaced and ineffective.

      • berg@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        You don’t get one without the other. You don’t get to choose.

        • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I don’t disagree with you. It’s desperately sad.

          edit: I’d made the erroneous assumption this was a reply to a higher level comment.

          What is it that you’re suggesting here?

      • circuscritic
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        You’re literally cheering for what you view as set of political upsides to war, and when I point out the rest of it, you get defensive.

        I wonder why.

        • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think this wondering you’re doing is the root cause of your problem.

          You’ve come up with an idea that I think there’s any political upsides to war based on some assumption that I haven’t quite figured out yet.

          You’ve come up with an entire “rest of it” which doesn’t really follow anything presented in the original post.

          Your “gotcha” moment doesn’t exist and is aimed at someone deeply saddened and angered by this pointless war.

          • circuscritic
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            2 days ago

            I appreciate you think that you have a point, and that it’s coherent, but you don’t, and it’s not.

            • CileTheSane
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              If they don’t have a point then what the fuck have you been going on about?