Increasing numbers of Australians are using medicinal cannabis for anxiety, depression, insomnia, substance disorders and more. Is it safe? And does it work?
Choosing to use corrupt data, corrupts the whole study. I dunno what’s so hard to understand it’s just really fucking simple. This isn’t some anti-vaccination conspiracy. There was a drug war. Billions of dollars a year eradicating cannabis and incarcerating people. We’re gonna use that government sponsored data in our modern studies???
So they studied a cannabis study from 1980 when cannabis was wildly illegal across the nation, and we were in the height of a war on drugs. We were supposed to trust that that data is valid enough to be included in a modern study?
Sir, did you even complete your high school education? I didn’t have to read more than a page of that study because the foundation of it is completely flawed.
How far has the clinical definition of depression drifted since 1980? You’re not even comparing the same disease at that time scale. It’s like no one even thought about what data to use in their data analysis. I think the stigma around mental health in 1985 was only rivaled by the stigma of drug use. What are we really studying here boiz?
Now im in the meat of it. They’re using studies with 35 participants. Seems super thorough. Great number makes the 200 participant study seem massive in comparison. They can barely draw a a conclusion due to the sampling size. lmaooo meta data analysis with bad data. Like I said I didn’t need to read this trash. but here I am. 23% of US adults use cannabis I’m sure they can run a real study if they wanted to learn something.
You’re going to have to point out where I was incorrect, they claim they used a model to exclude bias, but also included studies from the period of time. Is there something I need to look at directly. It reads just like any other cannabis study out there.
Here’s how we debate things when we can rub to brain cells together. From the article.
“There was insufficient data for ADHD, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and tobacco use disorder. Cannabinoids were associated with a greater risk of all-cause adverse events compared with placebo, but no higher odds of serious adverse events or study withdrawal. This Article systematically evaluates the efficacy and safety of cannabinoids for some of the most common indications that they are used to treat, providing clarity during a time of expanding clinical use. Sleep issues, post-traumatic stress disorder, and depression are some of the leading indications that cannabinoids are used to treat, yet there were only four randomised controlled trials for sleep issues, three for post-traumatic stress disorder, and none for depression that examined cannabinoid efficacy.”
You never engaged with me in the first place you just had some sassy one liners. Did I read the study? Yes fuck wit I read all the studies included in the meta analysis 20 years ago. I’m aware of the conclusions drawn by the old studies and their sources of funding: you couldn’t pull a valid scientific critique out of your fucking ass if it was leaking. Maybe stop commenting. It’s easier than blocking all the people that are going to be irate with your idiocy…
There’s no point in research that proves what people don’t want to hear. This is why Trump shut down the NIH.
Choosing to use corrupt data, corrupts the whole study. I dunno what’s so hard to understand it’s just really fucking simple. This isn’t some anti-vaccination conspiracy. There was a drug war. Billions of dollars a year eradicating cannabis and incarcerating people. We’re gonna use that government sponsored data in our modern studies???
YOU THINK DRUG RELATED DATA PRODUCED DURING A DRUG WAR IS RELEVANT?
So they studied a cannabis study from 1980 when cannabis was wildly illegal across the nation, and we were in the height of a war on drugs. We were supposed to trust that that data is valid enough to be included in a modern study?
Sir, did you even complete your high school education? I didn’t have to read more than a page of that study because the foundation of it is completely flawed.
It’s funny that you’re criticizing someone else’s intelligence while being confidently incorrect about the data used for the meta analysis.
How far has the clinical definition of depression drifted since 1980? You’re not even comparing the same disease at that time scale. It’s like no one even thought about what data to use in their data analysis. I think the stigma around mental health in 1985 was only rivaled by the stigma of drug use. What are we really studying here boiz?
Now im in the meat of it. They’re using studies with 35 participants. Seems super thorough. Great number makes the 200 participant study seem massive in comparison. They can barely draw a a conclusion due to the sampling size. lmaooo meta data analysis with bad data. Like I said I didn’t need to read this trash. but here I am. 23% of US adults use cannabis I’m sure they can run a real study if they wanted to learn something.
You’re going to have to point out where I was incorrect, they claim they used a model to exclude bias, but also included studies from the period of time. Is there something I need to look at directly. It reads just like any other cannabis study out there.
Here’s how we debate things when we can rub to brain cells together. From the article.
“There was insufficient data for ADHD, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and tobacco use disorder. Cannabinoids were associated with a greater risk of all-cause adverse events compared with placebo, but no higher odds of serious adverse events or study withdrawal. This Article systematically evaluates the efficacy and safety of cannabinoids for some of the most common indications that they are used to treat, providing clarity during a time of expanding clinical use. Sleep issues, post-traumatic stress disorder, and depression are some of the leading indications that cannabinoids are used to treat, yet there were only four randomised controlled trials for sleep issues, three for post-traumatic stress disorder, and none for depression that examined cannabinoid efficacy.”
What is with you leaving multiple comments on each of mine? I’m done engaging with you.
You never engaged with me in the first place you just had some sassy one liners. Did I read the study? Yes fuck wit I read all the studies included in the meta analysis 20 years ago. I’m aware of the conclusions drawn by the old studies and their sources of funding: you couldn’t pull a valid scientific critique out of your fucking ass if it was leaking. Maybe stop commenting. It’s easier than blocking all the people that are going to be irate with your idiocy…