Was just trying to explain to someone why everything is going to shit, specifically companies, and realized, I don’t fully get it either.

I’ve got the following explanation. The sentences marked with “???” are were I’m lost. Anyone mind telling me, if they’re correct and if so, why?

The past few years, central banks were giving out interest rates of 0% or even negative percentages. Regular banks would not quite pass this on, but you could still loan money and give it back later with no real interest payments.

This lead to lots of people investing in companies. As long as those companies paid out more money than those low interest rates, it was worthwhile. But at the same time, this meant companies didn’t have to be profitable, because they could pay out investors from money that other investors gave them???

This has stopped being the case, as central banks are hiking interest rates again, to combat inflation???

  • rab
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Simple, the world already ended and we are feeling the slow burn.

    Too many humans on the planet to be sustainable. People will start dying en masse in my lifetime, that’s just mother nature correcting things as she always has.

    We were on borrowed time since humans discovered agriculture and the fun is over now.

    • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Alright, Thats all bullshit.

      The planet can easily support our population. Hell, the planet could support double our population.

      The only reason why everything has gone to shit is the Rich and their greed. They’ve bought off governments to continue destroying the planet in their draconic lust for larger piles of gold to sit on, and adamantly refuse to change course for fear of it taking even a single, meaningless coin from their horde to do it.

      We have more than enough food to feed the whole planet, but capitalism has decided its more “cost effective” to burn half of it to maintain shareholder prices.

      There would be more than enough water available for everyone, but cleaning its to costly so lets just find another aquifer to drain and pollute.

      The climate would have been fine, if corporations and their dumping of terratons of pollution into the air wasnt handwaved away as “Well, its consumers fault, if they just skipped meals and stopped using paper, none of this would have happened”.

      More time and money and research has been spent on how to let the rich and corporations escape blame, than has been spent on trying to prevent these problems that scientists have been warning about for over 100 years.

      • rab
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I somewhat agree.

        The thing is that even if we did everything perfectly, the human race would still reproduce until it is unsustainable. It is in our nature.

        We are supposed to be animals, but at some point (discovery of agriculture) we detached from the food chain and defied mother nature. It is not possible to be sustainable from this point onwards.

        Personally I believe that human conscienceness was a mistake in evolution. If I could press a button that would kill billions of people including myself I would do so without hesitation.

        Recommend reading the thoughts of Pentti Linkola.

        • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The thing is that even if we did everything perfectly, the human race would still reproduce until it is unsustainable. It is in our nature.

          Sure, if you ignore the fact that global birthrates are falling, and sharply in some places.

          • rab
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah that’s because we hit max population. Population will start decreasing pretty soon I think.

            I said that if we lived “sustainably” we would reproduce until we couldn’t anymore

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The earth has enough resources to feed 12 billion or so of us humans, and only Anglo world is burning. Rest of the world shall prosper and make this earth a better place to live, while the imaginary white man burden crushes whites under their individualistic capitalist superimperialism machinery.

      • ILikeBoobies
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess you’ve never tried to breath in Delhi or Shanghai

          • ILikeBoobies
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Then why claim only the Anglo sphere is burning?

            It doesn’t make sense to me

            • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because capitalism is not as dominant and is much weaker outside of Anglosphere. There is some sense of collectivism. OP’s claim of everything going to shit is a doomer take based on their surrounding environment which is, with good probability, an Anglo country.