Hmmm. The article indicates a broken window, and further ‘medical and forensic evidence’. If the broken window was the point of access, it might indicate that a lot of the cuts sustained by the alleged intruder could be traced to the broken glass. That fact would change the entire scenario. It then becomes ‘much ado about nothing’.
You seem ti be living in some fantasy world of your own design, certainly not the reality in Canada. Why are you making all of these things up? Do you expect Canadians to believe you?
This is in Canada. You tell me. A cop finds someone in your car going through it. What are they going to do?