You can’t be a good Christian without first being persecuted against.
Hence the subservience to the guys who killed Jesus.
Seriously…Christians cucking for christ-killers is the epitome of Christian suffering.
(Just to clarify, I know the idea of “Jewish Deicide” is, itself, an antisemitic trope and doesn’t have historical backing. I just couldn’t resist the alliteration. I apologize).
Jesus’s message was a sharp contrast to the divine right of kings to steal from and kill anyone the voices in their head said they could. Jesus absolutely had to be as politically delicate as possible in his humanist contradictions to Moses, but like Socrates, it wasn’t enough, and Jewish elders definitely lobbied to kill him. The Catholics would erase Jesus under Constantine by declaring that God and Jesus were of the same matter, and so go back to Moses, voice in head, warmongering against any heretic who would say "but Jesus said… ". This went further under Charlemagne, where the holy spirit became co-equal matter, making it illegal for any person to use their conscience to question evil. Protestant movement simulatenously condemned the fascist supremacist evil of the erasing of Jesus and conscience, as the basis for their reform, while also keeping the trinity in tact, afterwards.
Since God’s story was written by the victorious King David line of El’s children, the supremacist nazification of the church must rely on ZIonaniism for their divine rights. Only a heretic would ask WWJD, when they should instead be proactively funding their Pastor’s G6 before he asks, because that is helpful (pro church/empire) independent thought.
A Zionazi, Israel chosen people first, rule over the US version of Christian nationalism, because that is bestest version to support war on Iran.
You can’t be a good Christian without first being persecuted against.
Hence the subservience to the guys who killed Jesus.
Seriously…Christians cucking for christ-killers is the epitome of Christian suffering.
(Just to clarify, I know the idea of “Jewish Deicide” is, itself, an antisemitic trope and doesn’t have historical backing. I just couldn’t resist the alliteration. I apologize).
Jesus’s message was a sharp contrast to the divine right of kings to steal from and kill anyone the voices in their head said they could. Jesus absolutely had to be as politically delicate as possible in his humanist contradictions to Moses, but like Socrates, it wasn’t enough, and Jewish elders definitely lobbied to kill him. The Catholics would erase Jesus under Constantine by declaring that God and Jesus were of the same matter, and so go back to Moses, voice in head, warmongering against any heretic who would say "but Jesus said… ". This went further under Charlemagne, where the holy spirit became co-equal matter, making it illegal for any person to use their conscience to question evil. Protestant movement simulatenously condemned the fascist supremacist evil of the erasing of Jesus and conscience, as the basis for their reform, while also keeping the trinity in tact, afterwards.
Since God’s story was written by the victorious King David line of El’s children, the supremacist nazification of the church must rely on ZIonaniism for their divine rights. Only a heretic would ask WWJD, when they should instead be proactively funding their Pastor’s G6 before he asks, because that is helpful (pro church/empire) independent thought.