• Binturong
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    That sex criminal hasn’t been comical in any form for decades, and personally I’d argue never was. Not that I expect anything from Sky, but they’re really diving deep in the muck to protect a notable sex pest this time. It’s almost like people shouldn’t be linking tabloid slop on here.

    • deHaga@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      What the fuck are you on about? They are covering his trial? How are they protecting him??

      It’s almost like people shouldn’t be linking tabloid slop on here.

      Your slop is enough mate. Fucking hell.

      • Binturong
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Oh hi, Russ. I’m not your mate govnah.

        If Sky were being honest in this headline they would not launder his reputation by invoking decades old labels for him, and instead say serial sex pest and known grifter Russel Brand. That’s what I’m fucking on about.

        • deHaga@feddit.ukOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          You are reading a lot from one headline mate. Quite the leap. The BBC, C4 and C5 employed him, not Sky ffs. And sky isn’t a tabloid, it’s a TV news channel.