A number of pro-gun rights Republicans pushed back on the administration’s argument that Alex Pretti was dangerous because he had a gun. Pretti was legally licensed to carry one.
A war of words over deeply held beliefs erupted on the political right in the hours after a federal agent shot and killed Alex Pretti on a Minneapolis street Saturday, pitting top officials in Donald Trump’s administration against Second Amendment defenders in his electoral base.
At the core of the debate is that Pretti — who was permitted to carry a gun in public in Minnesota — had a concealed firearm on his person that eyewitness videos show federal agents apparently discovering and removing during the altercation that led to his death. Videos do not appear to show Pretti holding the weapon during that confrontation.
Kristi Noem sought to justify the killing by asserting at a news conference that Pretti “attacked those officers, had a weapon on him, and multiple dozens of rounds of ammunition, wishing to inflict harm on these officers coming, brandishing like that and impeding their work that they were doing.” No evidence has been provided to back up this account.
He died because he’s the kind of person ICE fears most: someone who was willing to defend themselves, and knew how to do so legally.
He wasn’t defending himself, he was curled up on the ground covering himself as he was pulled, pushed, and BEATEN in every which way. Once the gun was discovered and pulled the agent in the green sweater literally pulled out his pistol and started shooting.
Clearly once the gun was removed from the altercation, it was now safe to kill him. What if they accidentally shot the gun and it caused the shot to ricochet or they hit the ammo clip and caused those to ignite/fire.
Finding and removing the gun made it safe to proceed.