Silliari@quokk.au to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 9 days agoi don't physically own it, i have a piece of paper in the town hall saying i doquokk.auimagemessage-square42linkfedilinkarrow-up1601arrow-down118 cross-posted to: 196@lemmy.worldmop@quokk.au
arrow-up1583arrow-down1imagei don't physically own it, i have a piece of paper in the town hall saying i doquokk.auSilliari@quokk.au to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square42linkfedilink cross-posted to: 196@lemmy.worldmop@quokk.au
minus-squareLushed_LungfishlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·9 days agoNot quite. I believe the historical consensus is that if you can defend it, you own it.
minus-squareazolus@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoLast time I checked the historical consensus was “they need the state to enforce property rights bc having their own militias to defend their property isn’t feasible”
Not quite. I believe the historical consensus is that if you can defend it, you own it.
Last time I checked the historical consensus was “they need the state to enforce property rights bc having their own militias to defend their property isn’t feasible”