• SilentStorms
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The user should always be in control of the 1s and 0s entering their computer. Allowing some data and not allowing others is not theft. It’s not all-or-nothing for which data Google sends me and recieves from me, that’s absurd.

    • MyFeetOwnMySoul
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This abstraction doesn’t make a ton of sense to me. Of course you’re in charge of your computer, but just because you’re free to choose a certain option, doesn’t make it moral, or legal. Using a companys service and making a special effort to withhold payment then saying “it’s not theft, they’re totally cool with it” is absurd. Why would they be cool with that?

      • SilentStorms
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t care of they’re cool with it, I’ll use my computer how I want to. Google makes hundreds of billions in annual revenue, it’s hard to feel bad for them. Calling that theft is a massive stretch, they are not losing anything except for potential profit, you could argue bandwidth but that is so intangible compared to any kind of physical theft.

        Keep in mind with adblocking we’re dealing with fractions of a penny per video and Google is still making money off me regardless. I directly support creators I like, sending them $10 is an order of magnitude more money than they would get over a lifetime of me watching ads.

        • MyFeetOwnMySoul
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          you could argue bandwidth but that is so intangible compared to any kind of physical theft.

          Have you ever paid hosting fees? Digital != Intangible.

          Its up to you to decide what kinds of theft you’re ok with. I definitely pirate things, but I don’t lie about it and say it’s not theft. I just accept that sometimes I’m the bad guy.