(not sure if this is the right community, sorry)

Hi, someone posted this on another server. I’d like to request we defederate with rammy.site and exploding-heads.com as well. I scrolled through some of their posts and comments and it’s full of ridiculous anti-left propaganda, for example a post where some liberal Florida family fleeing the state when some child protection laws got passed, implying liberals abuse children and won’t live in a state that doesn’t allow them to. Just take a look for yourself.

" Admins of Lemmy.ml please consider defederating from rammy.site it has been taken over by right wing malicious actors from exploding-heads.com and the admin is nowhere to be found.

It is imperative that you take action as soon as possible the users on rammy are using the site to spread their messages to a further audience, we must nip this in the bud. If you don’t believe me check the instance for yourself, you’ll see it dominated with bigoted right wing posts and spam communities."

Edit: So many commenters think this is about political opinions or disagreement. It’s not. If I said “Mixing bleach and ammonia is good for you” I bet some of you would call that a political disagreement.

  • MrSpArkle
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    And as 4chan taught us, ironic tongue-in-cheek bigotry leads to an environment where people engage in rational conversations about equitable and inclusive society.

    Wait no, it leads to a cesspool of racists encouraging each other to livestream their mass shooting of “inferior” races.

    You’re taking the bait of the “free marketplace of ideas”.

    • poweruser@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Very well said. This is why I am also in favor of “defederating over political preference”.

      Tolerating intolerance leads to violence but deplatforming actually does work to reduce harm.

      We should defederate from hateful and abusive instances

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      Seems pretty free to me. For example assuming your take, it will continue to exist even if you avert your eyes.

      • MrSpArkle
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t think you understand my take, but yes, it will continue to exist if i simply avert my eyes, however their content will reach and radicalize fewer people if they are defederated, and that means fewer people in favor of suppressing and killing minorities.

        • zephyrvs@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Can you provide evidence that people on these instances want to kill minorities?

        • ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          however their content will reach and radicalize fewer people if they are defederated

          The bullshit part of this purity ideology is where “people” are presumed to be innocent rubes who can’t think for themselves and who will be forever tainted if they are contaminated by even a drop of Wrongthink.

          I’m not interested in having my information environment manipulated by technocrats for “my own good.”

          And then there’s the other not-small issue: if “their” “content” is so good at “radicalizing” “people,” maybe you should be addressing the substance of the content instead of engaging in definitionally futile campaigns to conceal its existence.

          • MrSpArkle
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            It’s only bullshit if you’re naive about human nature and ignore the entire concept of memetics.

            As an example, Flat Earthers exist, and are continually indoctrinated via a whole ecosystem of blogs, videos, and online communities.

            You can take some of these flat earthers, once indoctrinated, show them clear experimental evidence to the contrary, and fail at convincing them the earth is round. With enough googling you can find videos of this on youtube, it’s quite amazing to watch the denial in action in the face of clear evidence.

            As the saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. I’d rather just delete the flat earth videos than spend 20k and a weekend to launch a gopro into space to convince someone the earth is round, and still fail at convincing them because the gopro uses microchips from the globe-heads that manipulate the real flat-earth imagery into being round.

            The futility is in trying to get the cat back in the bag.

          • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            And then there’s the other not-small issue: if “their” “content” is so good at “radicalizing” “people,” maybe you should be addressing the substance of the content instead of engaging in definitionally futile campaigns to conceal its existence.

            This is something that has been proven beyond impractical. Hate and disinformation campaigns have been practicing a digital gish-gallop for years, which is only increasing in pace with the wide availability of LLMs and other generative AI. The bar that you propose is rather absurd and would only be remotely achievable with those acting in good faith, which hate and disinformation campaigns do not.

        • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          If you’re saying the members of exploding-heads are in favor of and encouraging killing minorities, then no, I don’t understand. And so far you’re the only one who has suggested killing minorities, so I’d argue you seem a bit extremist.

          • MrSpArkle
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            And so far you’re the only one who has suggested killing minorities, so I’d argue you seem a bit extremist.

            I’m a bit slow so your trolling was working on me until this statement. Go fuck yourself.