• Pratai
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think I might be confused about the message of that cartoon. Because I’m wholeheartedly against AI taking over jobs. And I thought this was pro Ai.

      • Pratai
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. Wholeheartedly.

          • Pratai
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do you have problems following the topic of discussion? Because no one said anything about vacuums. For one, vacuums aren’t based on AI. Secondly, the topic is about AI taking jobs from people.

            Try and keep up.

            • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Modern robot vacuums do use AI. Try and keep up indeed.

              The point of the vacuum example is to understand which parts of a ‘job’ you have a problem with AI replacing, using a housework example which requires labor but provides no income. I take it from your non-answer that you have no problem with AI replacing labor, just not income. Is that correct?

              • Pratai
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                ROFL. A roomba is not AI. It’s just programmed to not bump into walls. Roomba’s don’t learn, nor are they taking anyone’s job

                Go back and read the meme. And this time- attempt to understand it. It’s about JOBS. not labor.