• Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    This article makes no sense in supporting the thesis.

    • AliasAKA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      It supports the thesis that Lumo is not open source in many common sense ways that most people would expect when a model claims it is open source. So in that sense, it does though.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      How so? It’s pretty clear that Proton using “open source” in context of their LLM service is demonstrated to be false.