gabriele97@lemmy.g97.top to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoXFS File-System Maintainer Stepping Downwww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1174arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1174arrow-down1external-linkXFS File-System Maintainer Stepping Downwww.phoronix.comgabriele97@lemmy.g97.top to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square29fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarelemmynglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoJust to clarify, the previous comment asked about benefits of XFS over ext4. But I completely agree with your reasons for choosing ext4.
minus-squareSynestine@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoOh, my bad. The two benefits to XFS that I’ve ever seen are that it has no inode limit like ext4 (which prevents the FS shrink). The other is that it seems to handle simultaneous I/O better than ext4 does; think very active database volumes and datastores.
Just to clarify, the previous comment asked about benefits of XFS over ext4. But I completely agree with your reasons for choosing ext4.
Oh, my bad.
The two benefits to XFS that I’ve ever seen are that it has no inode limit like ext4 (which prevents the FS shrink). The other is that it seems to handle simultaneous I/O better than ext4 does; think very active database volumes and datastores.