Some key insights from the article:

Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.

  • humanspiral
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    using old/existing FFs 3% of the time instead of 100% is a 97% emission reduction.