• acargitz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    No wealth above a certain amount should be inherited. There is no moral justification for absurd amounts of intergenerational wealth.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I don’t think “leaving money for my kids” will even be a thing anymore if we all just have UBI, Socialized Healthcare, Tax-Funded Free college, and support for people with diability. I mean, your kida aren’t gonna like depend on your wealth “or else they starve”, with all the automation that is replacing human workers, there will be a huge pool of money for UBI and, the kids can survive on UBI.

    • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      No wealth above a certain amount. There is no moral justification for absurd amounts of wealth.

      FTFY

      • acargitz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s true yours is a far more civilized way of doing it. My version, if you really think about it puts a target on the back of the Dragons to be slain early so that their Hoard is redistributed to the Free Peoples. Your version ensures that no Dragon ever hoards up too much and we save ourselves all the Dragon slaying dramatics.