"In August of this year, Rahul Goel will stand on the rocky cliffs of St. Lawrence, NL, watching a plume of fire rip across the sky.

If everything goes right, his company, NordSpace, will make history by orchestrating Canada’s first commercial rocket launch.

Canada was the fourth nation in the world to launch a satellite into space, helped pioneer aerospace engineering, and famously built the Canadarm. But for all its expertise, Canada has never launched a rocket from its own soil. Every satellite, every national security payload, every commercial launch is outsourced, mostly to the US."

The above is not the full article. Read the rest of the article by visiting the link. Supporting independent news is as easy as visiting their site!

  • GrizzlyBurOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    “If everything goes right, his company, NordSpace, will make history by orchestrating Canada’s first commercial rocket launch.”

    This is a private entity, not the government. Unless you mean you want a private company to somehow do more dental coverage and a private company to make private transit public.

    You could have at least read the blurb I put in the body text of the post.

    • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yay another fucking private company that will lobby politicians and eventually push its owner to a Musk level position and can abuse government grants and tax breaks instead of investing in Canadian public services.

      • masterspace
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Your reasoning is Elon bad, Elon do rockets, so rockets be bad.

        It’s kindergarten level.

        • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’ll bet you are fine with celebrities using private jets to fly everywhere without thinking of the impact on the environment. Taylor Swift should be fined to shit for the amount she’s polluting with her tours.

          I’m against the privatization of environmental disasters and the CEOs lack of accountability.

          • masterspace
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I’ll bet you’re not worth engaging with because you view the world in childish black and white terms.

          • Rob Bos
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Clearly you hate jets, so flying jets to deliver medicines to sick children are a bad thing? You are a horrible person.

            Two can play at the wilful misunderstanding game…

            • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Can you distinguish the difference between life saving medicine and a celebrity touring with daily jet flights?

              There’s a difference in case you can’t tell.

              • Rob Bos
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Yes. I’m glad you understand my argument. And can you distinguish the difference between launching Earth-monitoring satellites, communication satellites, exploration satellites, and penis rockets for billionaires?

                • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 hours ago

                  The difference is one is run and regulated by the local government and the other is a private company whose only goal is make number go up at all costs.

                  Rocket launches should government/public and not owned by another company that will enshittify and fleece the public once they have established themselves as the one monopoly and have driven out all competition.

                  Why the fuck do you want to give “earth monitoring satellites” and the communication system of an entire country to a fucking private corporation….

                  • Rob Bos
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    6 hours ago

                    Aren’t you a peach.

                    Well, here’s a straw man for you. Go nuts.

      • GrizzlyBurOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You are really good at taking the good and the bad, but throwing away the good so you only have the bad.

        These guys have given us no reason to believe that they will be anything like Musk. There are hundreds and thousands of private companies that operate within the law and/or ethically in general. Other people have already given you many reasons why being able to do our own domestic (albeit private) rocket launches is extremely beneficial. Such as doing our own starlink instead of using Musks’.

        I’m pretty anti-capitalist and a Musk-hater as they come too, but I feel you are just speaking from a place of anger, not reason. Even if it were the government doing this, space infrastructure development is just as important for Canadian citizens as more dental coverage and overhauling public transit.

        • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          And you have no foresight.

          You don’t want Starlink but want to replace it with another private company instead of it being government funded and controlled….

          These private companies are literally blasting countless environmental toxins with each failed rocket. That kind of environmental impact should be government regulated and not left to some tech bro to experiment with.

          • GrizzlyBurOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I agree that having the government do it would be ideal, though a government could fumble it just as bad or worse than any private company. I’ll take a flawed domestic starlink/rocket launches over none at all. Especially if the alternative means relying on America/Musk even more.

            I don’t know about the toxins from launches, but I think it must be a drop in the bucket compared to air travel, cars, and dirty electricty generation. If that is what it takes to get us space infrastructure, I’d call that the cost of doing business. I also have faith that there can be reasonable way to mitigate the damage such as choice of where they are launched and further developing the technology. Much of the tech has gone largely unchanged from the moon landing era, afaik.