My Good Fellow@lemmy.ml to English usage and grammarEnglish · 1 year agoI'm surprised at the BBC....lemmy.mlimagemessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down19
arrow-up1-3arrow-down1imageI'm surprised at the BBC....lemmy.mlMy Good Fellow@lemmy.ml to English usage and grammarEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareSourCreamAndGarliclinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoIt’s cherry-picking if you only use one dictionary. It’s present in the Merriam-Webster dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rooves Ultimately I’d never use it. It’s archaic and not in common enough use generally to feel good to use. Similar to monkies as the archaic version of monkeys.
It’s cherry-picking if you only use one dictionary. It’s present in the Merriam-Webster dictionary.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rooves
Ultimately I’d never use it. It’s archaic and not in common enough use generally to feel good to use. Similar to monkies as the archaic version of monkeys.