- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/45430254
Germany has been one of the worst Western countries for whitewashing Israel’s genocide in Palestine. Now it wants to do it with AI.
Some of the stuff in that piece of text is reasonable, other stuff is not. Somehow Israel being uniquely excluded from accusations of racism for example. Or precluding a priori any comparison with past atrocities regardless of what Israeli policy is actually doing.
That’s the whole fucking problem though with IHRA using Israel the state as a unit of analysis. It’s taking good points and mixing them up with incredibly fucked up ones, and is therefore very easy to be instrumentalised by Israeli nationalists to use the former to shield the latter.
The Jerusalem definition on the other hand addresses the problem explicitly.
You mean this section?
Sure, this is a good example of the bad mixing, because it makes the second part of the clause an example of the first part.
It’s like including smiling at children in the definition of pedophilia. Sure pedophiles will do that, but smiling at kids should not be in itself criminalized.
One can at the same time assert the right of the Jewish people to self determination and at the same time recognize the historical racism that brought it into existence:
I mean, the Canadian people have a right to self determination and at the same time Canada is a racist settler colonial project at its inception. Why is Israel uniquely shielded from this kind of criticism? Recognizing the latter is in no way negating the former.