- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
In January 2023, the Dutch city of The Hague introduced a first-of-its-kind municipal ordinance banning advertisements for fossil fuels, fossil-powered transport, and the aviation sector in all public spaces, including bus stops, billboards, and other outdoor media platforms managed by the city.
[…]
Shortly after its introduction, the ordinance was challenged by travel companies which argued that the ban was too broad and restricted their commercial interests.
However, in April 2024, a Dutch court ruled that the city of The Hague acted lawfully in introducing the ban. The court recognized the city’s right — and responsibility — to protect public health and the environment, especially in the context of the climate crisis. This ruling not only safeguards the fossil ad ban but also sets a legal precedent for other cities worldwide to follow.
[…]
Why the hell do fossil fuel companies even need to advertise?
They don’t offer anything unique, fuel is fuel. If it’s for home heating or electricity I do t exactly have a choice in who provides It.
If it’s gas for a vehicle I’m choosing whoever is closest when I need gas because everyone is always magocally the exact same price everywhere.
How does advertising even benefit them at all?
Greenwashing.
I am Dutch and all Shell adds I have seen is about how much they are moving into green technology.
Yet, during a share holders meeting they proudly state they will not do that and invest more in oil because ‘the oil market still saw growth.’
Or that the green investments is mostly into hydrogen, so that they can continue with their production scarcity nonsense.
Propaganda is a powerful manipulator. Design/ad budgets change how people think about things. Fossil fuel companies should absolutely not be allowed to spend money on ads: that money should go toward climate repititions.
I think this includes ads for non-electric cars, which is huge. Flights too.