• softcat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is a very stupid comment. Librewolf literally takes Firefox and hardens it. If there is no Firefox, there is no Librewolf.

      • softcat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Huh? You’re literally recommending a fork of Firefox that won’t exist without Firefox. How can i be any more clear? Your comment is absolutely ridiculously stupid. “Hurting Google in the now” is completely irrelevant to the topic at hand. Please be smarter.

              • T (they/she)@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Have you considered that maybe you could have worded your comment in a different way without just saying it was “stupid”? You are correct about Librewolf but there was no need to reply it that way

            • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              surely. until sites start breaking hard and severe security vulnerabilities get found. without maintenance it won’t be all that useful

    • entropicshart@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 months ago

      Isn’t that a fork of Firefox that still relies on Firefox development? Would it continue to exist if Mozilla shutdown and Firefox was no longer maintained?

      • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        6 months ago

        LibreWolf strips Firefox of telemetry, adds privacy and security tweaks, disables Pocket, and ships with uBlock Origin by default. It’s basically Firefox with hardened defaults and no Mozilla connections.

        If Firefox ever collapsed, libreWolf couldn’t continue independently long-term, they rely entirely on Firefox’s upstream codebase. They don’t maintain their own engine (Gecko), so they’d lose the foundation their browser is built on. It’d be the end unless a fork of Gecko emerged.

      • buffysummers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Isn’t that a fork of Firefox that still relies on Firefox development?

        Yes. And it seems like a lot of people who shill for it don’t understand that. If every Firefox user switched to LibreWolf then there would be no more Firefox and then no more LibreWolf. Firefox has done some questionable things lately but all of us jumping ship to something like LibreWolf isn’t the answer.

        Would it continue to exist if Mozilla shutdown and Firefox was no longer maintained?

        Nope.

      • softcat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        deleted by creator